Re: ejb deployment: reasons for binding the factories?

[Armin Waibel <ar...@code-au-lait.de>]

Hi,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vincenz Braun" <vb...@evelox.de>
To: <oj...@db.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: ejb deployment: reasons for binding the factories?


> Hello,
> 
> I wonder why the PBFactory or ODMG Implementation is
> bound to a Context. For OMDG this would make sense to me
> if there were a TransformFactory like interface for getting
> the implementation class (so one can transparently use another
> implementation).

yes!

>What are the reasons why not simply
> use the factory calls as outside of an ejb container. 
> 
> The only reason i can consider of is the security constraint
> in dynamically loading classes.
> 
> Is that right? Or do i miss a thing?

you are right, you could directly use PB-api without any
problems, and ODMG using the OJBJ2EE_2 class.

> Some remarks in the documentation why this is needed would help 
> a lot (at least me)

I'm in agreement with you, it's not needed.

regards,
Armin

> 
> Thanks,
> Vincenz
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
>