[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2080) ReconfigRecoveryTest fails intermittently

["Raul Gutierrez Segales (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526245#comment-14526245 ] 

Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---------------------------------------------------

It passes pretty consistently for me locally:

{noformat}
~/src/zookeeper-svn (ZOOKEEPER-2171) ✔ ant -Dtestcase=ReconfigRecoveryTest test-core-java^
....

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 3 minutes 28 seconds
{noformat}

So I am tempted to propose a patch that raises the wait timeout for 'waiting for server 2 being up' and call it a day, unless someone has an proposal to refactor this test and make it more robust all together. Thoughts?

> ReconfigRecoveryTest fails intermittently
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I got the following test failure on MacBook with trunk code:
> {code}
> Testcase: testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig took 93.628 sec
>   FAILED
> waiting for server 2 being up
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: waiting for server 2 being up
>   at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig(ReconfigRecoveryTest.java:529)
>   at org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit4ZKTestRunner.java:52)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)