You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com> on 2009/08/13 14:24:09 UTC
Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4742) Connector portlets for Tomcat
does not work
Agree to remove the portlet. Simple and efficient. :-D
Jeff C
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Shawn Jiang (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742790#action_12742790]
>
> Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4742:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> If we don't choose big edit box, we are choosing to keep current port-let.
>
> Current web server port-let is used to provide a easy way to manage the
> connectors of web container. I really don't think this is useful as before
> because the connector configuration method have been changed to server.xml.
>
> 1, Unlike GBean way, the server.xml way to configure connector is very
> easy and straightforward.
> 2, IIUC, Web Connector configuration is not a very frequent task from my
> understanding.
>
> For the two reasons listed above, I highly doubt if it's worthy to add
> many wrap connectorGBeans for connectors loaded from server.xml just to meet
> a function that is not very useful anymore. What I'm suggesting is to remove
> the current web manager port-let for tomcat build directly. : )
>
> What do you say ?
>
> > Connector portlets for Tomcat does not work
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: GERONIMO-4742
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4742
> > Project: Geronimo
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> > Affects Versions: 2.2
> > Reporter: Ivan
> > Assignee: Ivan
> > Fix For: 2.2
> >
> >
> > After refactoriing Tomcat integratoin codes, currently, the connector
> portlet does not work.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>