You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Matthias Fischer <m....@abc-media.de> on 2002/07/08 08:28:55 UTC
RE: Keep-together and allies
No need to prostrate yourself...
If you are so much ashamed, what should then Mr. Bush be?
Matthias
-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Fiol [mailto:fiol@w3ping.com]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 3:07 PM
To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Keep-together and friends
I should have read the archives before posting.
I am really sorry and ashamed... I won't do that again. I promise.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=102102545323696&w=2
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=102102545323696&w=2>
Antonio Fiol
Antonio Fiol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a table with the following structure:
> <table-row>
> <table-cell><block>text1</block><block>image1</block></table-cell>
> <table-cell><block>text2</block><block>image2</block></table-cell>
> </table-row>
> <table-row>
> <table-cell
>
number-columns-spanned="2"><block>text3</block><block>image3</block></table-
cell>
>
> </table-row>
>
> I would like to avoid text3 appearing at the end of a page, and image3
> on the following.
> I tried:
> <table-row keep-together="always">...
> and
> ...<block keep-with-next="always">text3</block>...
>
> None worked.
>
> I think it may be because I did not include ".within-page" anywhere.
>
> However, I also tried:
> <table-row keep-together.within-page="always">...
> and
> <table-row keep-together=".within-page=always">...
>
> I did not expect the second to work, but neither did the first.
>
> Can anyone point me to the solution (I must be close enough, but I
> can't see it).
>
>
> Also...
> I have a table and I would like to either
>
> a) make the first row refrain from appearing "alone" at the end of a
> page.
> or
> b) make the first row appear on each page that a portion of the table
> is rendered.
>
> I have not started trying on this.
>
> I suppose that (a) could be accomplished with <table-row
> keep-with-next...(something, that I'll learn from the answer to the
> other question)...>. But I have no idea whether (b) is possible or
> not, and I'd prefer that, if possible.
>
> Is it possible?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>
> Antonio Fiol
>
>
>
> .
>