route id

[Tom Drake <rt...@pobox.com>]

Costin:

Should this routing id be an attribute of the one of the Container
objects (e.g. Server, Service), instead of the Manager?


Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: <co...@covalent.net>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>; "Tom Drake"
<rt...@pobox.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


| On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
|
| > Costin:
| >
| > Where does Manager get the 'route id' from.
|
| Easiest: from server.xml ( just add an option somewhere
| that can be set on the Manager ). I would make it a
| property of server or service, as it is an id for
| the running instance of tomcat.
| That require setting exactly the same id as the worker
| name in workers.properties.
|
| Harder: the information is sent by apache
| along with the request. You can check ( in AjpRequest )
| if Manager has a 'id' set, and if not set it.
|
| That will not solve the problem of 'multiple workers
| for the same tomcat' - but that shouldn't affect 4.0
| ( since a single worker type is available - ajp13 ),
| and will not be a problem in jk2 ( or if it is, we'll
| solve it then )
|
| Costin
|
|
|
|
| >
| > Tom
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > From: <co...@covalent.net>
| > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
| > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:11 PM
| > Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1
| >
| >
| > | On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
| > |
| > | > > The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
| > | > > is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
| > | > >
| > | > > What about ?
| > | >
| > | > I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector
?
| > | > There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very
well
| > | > documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.
| > |
| > | I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
| > | remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
| > | connector / protocol ).
| > |
| > | Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...
| > |
| > |
| > | Costin
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | --
| > | To unsubscribe, e-mail:
| > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
| > | For additional commands, e-mail:
| > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| > --
| > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
| > For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
| >
|
|
| --
| To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
| For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
|
|
|


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: route id

["Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote:

> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:46:30 -0800
> From: Tom Drake <rt...@pobox.com>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <to...@jakarta.apache.org>,
>      Tom Drake <rt...@pobox.com>
> To: Tomcat Developers List <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: route id
>
> Costin:
>
> Should this routing id be an attribute of the one of the Container
> objects (e.g. Server, Service), instead of the Manager?
>

Adding it to Engine would seem to be the easiest.  It would then be
visible from both the request processing pipeline and from the Manager.

If that's ok with everyone, I will add it to both branches.

>
> Tom
>

Craig McClanahan



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>