You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> on 2014/09/07 05:36:00 UTC

[VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have passed
our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100
JIRAs closed in the last month.

As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our previous
release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license and
notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that are
distributed as part of our convenience binary.

The vote thread can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E

The vote passed with:
+5 binding
+6 non-binding

You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/

I look forward to your feedback.

Thanks,
Jacques

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.

Well, I was trying to gently ask if there was some way to break the impasse
between different versions of the documentation.

Obviously you saw one thing and Jacques saw another.  But you said what he
saw was out of date.  How could he tell that?  Have you rectified the
competing versions of documentation?



On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ted,
>
> Do you mean more than here:
>
> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the new process documented somewhere?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > > something
> > > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > approves
> > > > that release:
> > > >
> > > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > > directories" [1]
> > > >
> > > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> > piece
> > > > of information:
> > > >
> > > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space
> to
> > > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > >
> > > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
> > >
> > > Note that the DEV tree at
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
> > >
> > > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
> > >
> > > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
> > >
> > > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> > > transfer the files from dev to release area.
> > > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> > > SVN revision number)
> > >
> > > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> > approval
> > > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe
> that
> > > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <
> john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > >>
> > > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > >>
> > > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi John,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > > concerns:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> > copyright
> > > and
> > > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > > tests.
> > > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
> of
> > > >> their
> > > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > code.
> > > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> are
> > > for
> > > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > >> > purposes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > >> > vs 0.5.0)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature
> of
> > > the
> > > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> the
> > > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > > candidates so
> > > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > > candidate
> > > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > > Apache
> > > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > > For
> > > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been
> our
> > > >> > strategy thus far:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our m1 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2
> (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3
> (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > > (approved)
> > > >> -->
> > > >> > and distributed as
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > >> > distributed as
> > > >> >
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2
> (pending)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > > process.
> > > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > external
> > > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > >> > Jacques
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > >> > vs
> > > >> > > 0.5.0)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > John
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > >> release
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> > have
> > > >> > passed
> > > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> with
> > > over
> > > >> > 100
> > > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
> > our
> > > >> > > previous
> > > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > > license
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary
> dependencies
> > > that
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The vote passed with:
> > > >> > > > +5 binding
> > > >> > > > +6 non-binding
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > Jacques
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 9 September 2014 13:24, jan i <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 9 September 2014 06:51, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> Actually, on reading the links you provide, neither provides solid guidance
>> about the issue in question.  The second link comes closest where it says
>> that projects typically use one of three different methods.  How does this
>> document your strong preference for a single one of these alternatives?
>>
> If we really have a strong preference or even a mandatory way of doing
> this, then it should be clearly stated and not something different people
> interpret differently.
>
> I see
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
>
> as an elegant way of doing it, let me put it differently if a project
> prefer to it differently it might not be elegant enough (or well
> documented).
>
> I think we really need to be careful not to make rules just because we can.
> Giving projects freedom where possible should be our goal.

+1

However, we need to document what functions the process needs to support.

For example, the release vote e-mail should uniquely identify the
release artifacts so that they can be traced back from the public
release area to the vote e-mail.

Also the vote email should provide sufficient information that anyone
can check the release without needing to search for additional
information (e.g. it should link to KEYS etc)

i.e. we need to document _what_ must be done, without necessarily
prescribing _how_ to do it.
Though of course it helps to document a recommended process that meets
the requirements.

> just my opinion.
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ted,
>> >
>> > Do you mean more than here:
>> >
>> > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
>> > [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Is the new process documented somewhere?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
>> > > > something
>> > > > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
>> > > > approves
>> > > > > that release:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
>> > > > > directories" [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
>> > > piece
>> > > > > of information:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home
>> space
>> > to
>> > > > > make available release candidates. " [1]
>> > > >
>> > > > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
>> > > >
>> > > > Note that the DEV tree at
>> > > >
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
>> > > >
>> > > > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
>> > > >
>> > > > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
>> > > >
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
>> > > >
>> > > > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
>> > > > transfer the files from dev to release area.
>> > > > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes
>> the
>> > > > SVN revision number)
>> > > >
>> > > > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
>> > > approval
>> > > > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe
>> > that
>> > > > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Jacques
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <
>> > john.d.ament@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
>> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <
>> jacques@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Hi John,
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
>> > > > concerns:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
>> > > copyright
>> > > > and
>> > > > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT
>> license.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data
>> directory.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various
>> unit
>> > > > tests.
>> > > > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases
>> because
>> > of
>> > > > >> their
>> > > > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
>> > > code.
>> > > > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
>> > are
>> > > > for
>> > > > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for
>> testing
>> > > > >> > purposes.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
>> > > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
>> > > > >> > vs 0.5.0)
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature
>> > of
>> > > > the
>> > > > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
>> > the
>> > > > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
>> > > > candidates so
>> > > > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
>> > > > candidate
>> > > > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on
>> the
>> > > > Apache
>> > > > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release
>> directory.
>> > > > For
>> > > > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been
>> > our
>> > > > >> > strategy thus far:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > our m1 release:
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2
>> > (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3
>> > (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
>> > > > (approved)
>> > > > >> -->
>> > > > >> > and distributed as
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
>> > (approved)
>> > > > -->
>> > > > >> > distributed as
>> > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
>> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2
>> > (pending)
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
>> > > > process.
>> > > > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
>> > > > external
>> > > > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for
>> our
>> > > > >> release.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
>> > > > >> > Jacques
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
>> > > john.d.ament@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > Hi,
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
>> > > > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data
>> directory.
>> > > > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
>> > > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
>> > > > >> > vs
>> > > > >> > > 0.5.0)
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > John
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
>> > > jacques@apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill
>> 0.5.0-incubating
>> > > > >> release
>> > > > >> > to
>> > > > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of
>> artifacts
>> > > have
>> > > > >> > passed
>> > > > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
>> > with
>> > > > over
>> > > > >> > 100
>> > > > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback
>> in
>> > > our
>> > > > >> > > previous
>> > > > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
>> > > > license
>> > > > >> and
>> > > > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary
>> > dependencies
>> > > > that
>> > > > >> > are
>> > > > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > The vote passed with:
>> > > > >> > > > +5 binding
>> > > > >> > > > +6 non-binding
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
>> > > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > >> > > > Jacques
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.

On 9 September 2014 06:51, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:

> John,
>
> Actually, on reading the links you provide, neither provides solid guidance
> about the issue in question.  The second link comes closest where it says
> that projects typically use one of three different methods.  How does this
> document your strong preference for a single one of these alternatives?
>
If we really have a strong preference or even a mandatory way of doing
this, then it should be clearly stated and not something different people
interpret differently.

I see
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz

as an elegant way of doing it, let me put it differently if a project
prefer to it differently it might not be elegant enough (or well
documented).

I think we really need to be careful not to make rules just because we can.
Giving projects freedom where possible should be our goal.

just my opinion.
rgds
jan i.


>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > Do you mean more than here:
> >
> > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> > [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the new process documented somewhere?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > > > something
> > > > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > > approves
> > > > > that release:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > > > directories" [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> > > piece
> > > > > of information:
> > > > >
> > > > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home
> space
> > to
> > > > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > > >
> > > > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the DEV tree at
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
> > > >
> > > > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
> > > >
> > > > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
> > > >
> > > > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> > > > transfer the files from dev to release area.
> > > > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes
> the
> > > > SVN revision number)
> > > >
> > > > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> > > approval
> > > > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe
> > that
> > > > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi John,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > > > concerns:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> > > copyright
> > > > and
> > > > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT
> license.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data
> directory.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various
> unit
> > > > tests.
> > > > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases
> because
> > of
> > > > >> their
> > > > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > > code.
> > > > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> > are
> > > > for
> > > > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for
> testing
> > > > >> > purposes.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > >> > vs 0.5.0)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> > the
> > > > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > > > candidates so
> > > > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > > > candidate
> > > > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on
> the
> > > > Apache
> > > > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release
> directory.
> > > > For
> > > > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been
> > our
> > > > >> > strategy thus far:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > our m1 release:
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2
> > (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3
> > (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > > > (approved)
> > > > >> -->
> > > > >> > and distributed as
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> > (approved)
> > > > -->
> > > > >> > distributed as
> > > > >> >
> > > >
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2
> > (pending)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > > > process.
> > > > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > > external
> > > > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for
> our
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > > >> > Jacques
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data
> directory.
> > > > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > >> > vs
> > > > >> > > 0.5.0)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > John
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > > jacques@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill
> 0.5.0-incubating
> > > > >> release
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of
> artifacts
> > > have
> > > > >> > passed
> > > > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> > with
> > > > over
> > > > >> > 100
> > > > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback
> in
> > > our
> > > > >> > > previous
> > > > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > > > license
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary
> > dependencies
> > > > that
> > > > >> > are
> > > > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > >> > > > +5 binding
> > > > >> > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > Jacques
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.

John,

Actually, on reading the links you provide, neither provides solid guidance
about the issue in question.  The second link comes closest where it says
that projects typically use one of three different methods.  How does this
document your strong preference for a single one of these alternatives?




On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ted,
>
> Do you mean more than here:
>
> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the new process documented somewhere?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > > something
> > > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > approves
> > > > that release:
> > > >
> > > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > > directories" [1]
> > > >
> > > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> > piece
> > > > of information:
> > > >
> > > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space
> to
> > > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > >
> > > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
> > >
> > > Note that the DEV tree at
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
> > >
> > > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
> > >
> > > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
> > >
> > > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> > > transfer the files from dev to release area.
> > > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> > > SVN revision number)
> > >
> > > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> > approval
> > > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe
> that
> > > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <
> john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > >>
> > > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > >>
> > > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi John,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > > concerns:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> > copyright
> > > and
> > > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > > tests.
> > > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
> of
> > > >> their
> > > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > code.
> > > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> are
> > > for
> > > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > >> > purposes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > >> > vs 0.5.0)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature
> of
> > > the
> > > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> the
> > > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > > candidates so
> > > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > > candidate
> > > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > > Apache
> > > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > > For
> > > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been
> our
> > > >> > strategy thus far:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our m1 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2
> (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3
> (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > > (approved)
> > > >> -->
> > > >> > and distributed as
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > >> > distributed as
> > > >> >
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2
> (pending)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > > process.
> > > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > external
> > > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > >> > Jacques
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > > >> > vs
> > > >> > > 0.5.0)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > John
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > >> release
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> > have
> > > >> > passed
> > > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> with
> > > over
> > > >> > 100
> > > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
> > our
> > > >> > > previous
> > > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > > license
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary
> dependencies
> > > that
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The vote passed with:
> > > >> > > > +5 binding
> > > >> > > > +6 non-binding
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > Jacques
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.

Ted,

Do you mean more than here:

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
[2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the new process documented somewhere?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > approves
> > > that release:
> > >
> > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > directories" [1]
> > >
> > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> piece
> > > of information:
> > >
> > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> >
> > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
> >
> > Note that the DEV tree at
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
> >
> > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
> >
> > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
> >
> > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> > transfer the files from dev to release area.
> > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> > SVN revision number)
> >
> > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> approval
> > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > >>
> > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > >>
> > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi John,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > concerns:
> > >> >
> > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > >> >
> > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> copyright
> > and
> > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > >> >
> > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > >> >
> > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > tests.
> > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> > >> their
> > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> code.
> > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> > for
> > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > >> > purposes.
> > >> >
> > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > >> > vs 0.5.0)
> > >> >
> > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> > the
> > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > candidates so
> > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > candidate
> > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > Apache
> > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > For
> > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > >> > strategy thus far:
> > >> >
> > >> > our m1 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > (approved)
> > >> -->
> > >> > and distributed as
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > >> >
> > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> > -->
> > >> > distributed as
> > >> >
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > >> >
> > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > process.
> > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > external
> > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > >> >
> > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > >> release.
> > >> >
> > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > >> > Jacques
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > >> > vs
> > >> > > 0.5.0)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > John
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > >> release
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> have
> > >> > passed
> > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with
> > over
> > >> > 100
> > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
> our
> > >> > > previous
> > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > license
> > >> and
> > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > that
> > >> > are
> > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote passed with:
> > >> > > > +5 binding
> > >> > > > +6 non-binding
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Jacques
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.

Is the new process documented somewhere?




On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> something
> > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> approves
> > that release:
> >
> > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > directories" [1]
> >
> > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
> > of information:
> >
> > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > make available release candidates. " [1]
>
> Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
>
> Note that the DEV tree at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
>
> is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
>
> The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
>
> Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> transfer the files from dev to release area.
> This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> SVN revision number)
>
> > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
> > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> >>
> >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> >>
> >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi John,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> concerns:
> >> >
> >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> >> >
> >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright
> and
> >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> >> >
> >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> >> >
> >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> tests.
> >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> >> their
> >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
> >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> for
> >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> >> > purposes.
> >> >
> >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> >> (0.5.0.rc2
> >> > vs 0.5.0)
> >> >
> >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> the
> >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> candidates so
> >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> candidate
> >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> Apache
> >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> For
> >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> >> > strategy thus far:
> >> >
> >> > our m1 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> (approved)
> >> -->
> >> > and distributed as
> >> >
> >>
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> >> >
> >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> -->
> >> > distributed as
> >> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> >> >
> >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> process.
> >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> external
> >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> >> >
> >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> >> release.
> >> >
> >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> >> > Jacques
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> >> (0.5.0.rc2
> >> > vs
> >> > > 0.5.0)
> >> > >
> >> > > John
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> >> release
> >> > to
> >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have
> >> > passed
> >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with
> over
> >> > 100
> >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> >> > > previous
> >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> license
> >> and
> >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> that
> >> > are
> >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote passed with:
> >> > > > +5 binding
> >> > > > +6 non-binding
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Jacques
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something
> on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves
> that release:
>
> "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> directories" [1]
>
> For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
> of information:
>
> "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> make available release candidates. " [1]

Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.

Note that the DEV tree at

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz

is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist

The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz

Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
transfer the files from dev to release area.
This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
SVN revision number)

> To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
> here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
>
> Thanks,
> Jacques
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I have to vote -1
>>
>> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
>>
>> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:
>> >
>> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
>> >
>> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and
>> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
>> >
>> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
>> >
>> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit tests.
>> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
>> their
>> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
>> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are for
>> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
>> > purposes.
>> >
>> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
>> (0.5.0.rc2
>> > vs 0.5.0)
>> >
>> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of the
>> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
>> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release candidates so
>> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release candidate
>> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the Apache
>> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.  For
>> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
>> > strategy thus far:
>> >
>> > our m1 release:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4 (approved)
>> -->
>> > and distributed as
>> >
>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
>> >
>> > our 0.4.0 release:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved) -->
>> > distributed as
>> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
>> >
>> > our 0.5.0 release:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
>> >
>> >
>> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting process.
>> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that external
>> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
>> >
>> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
>> release.
>> >
>> > thanks again for your feedback,
>> > Jacques
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
>> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
>> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
>> (0.5.0.rc2
>> > vs
>> > > 0.5.0)
>> > >
>> > > John
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
>> release
>> > to
>> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have
>> > passed
>> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over
>> > 100
>> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
>> > > >
>> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
>> > > previous
>> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license
>> and
>> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that
>> > are
>> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote passed with:
>> > > > +5 binding
>> > > > +6 non-binding
>> > > >
>> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
>> > > >
>> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Jacques
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.

Hey John,

Thanks for the vote and the information.  I didn't even realize that the
dist.a.o/dev folder existed at until I read your reference at [1].  Always
new things to learn.  I guess that is another option as opposed to the old
skool people.a.o.

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc


On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:48 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > approves
> > > that release:
> > >
> > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > directories" [1]
> > >
> > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> piece
> > > of information:
> > >
> > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > >
> > I do agree with your POW. Important is:
> > - The release bits are in SVN
> > - The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.
> >
> > dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
> > mandatory location to use for the vote itself.
> >
> >
> Hmm Ok, now that I re-read the maven and release policy at [1] and [2], I
> guess it's a wherever it ends up type of thing.
>
> With that said, I'll switch to a +1
>
> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>
>
> >
> > rgds
> > jan i.
> >
> > >
> > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> approval
> > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > >
> > > > The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > >
> > > > If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > concerns:
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> copyright
> > > and
> > > > > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > > tests.
> > > > >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
> of
> > > > their
> > > > > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > code.
> > > > >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> are
> > > for
> > > > > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > > > purposes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs 0.5.0)
> > > > >
> > > > > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> > the
> > > > > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> the
> > > > > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > candidates
> > > so
> > > > > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > candidate
> > > > > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > > Apache
> > > > > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > For
> > > > > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > > > > strategy thus far:
> > > > >
> > > > > our m1 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > (approved)
> > > > -->
> > > > > and distributed as
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > > > distributed as
> > > > >
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > process.
> > > > >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > external
> > > > > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs
> > > > > > 0.5.0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > > release
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> > have
> > > > > passed
> > > > > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> with
> > > over
> > > > > 100
> > > > > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
> our
> > > > > > previous
> > > > > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > license
> > > > and
> > > > > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > > that
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > > > > +5 binding
> > > > > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Jacques
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.

On 7 September 2014 21:48, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > approves
> > > that release:
> > >
> > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > directories" [1]
> > >
> > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> piece
> > > of information:
> > >
> > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > >
> > I do agree with your POW. Important is:
> > - The release bits are in SVN
> > - The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.
> >
> > dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
> > mandatory location to use for the vote itself.
>
Sorry forgot an important line.

+1 (binding).

have fun
jan I.


> >
> >
> Hmm Ok, now that I re-read the maven and release policy at [1] and [2], I
> guess it's a wherever it ends up type of thing.
>
> With that said, I'll switch to a +1
>


>
> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>
>
> >
> > rgds
> > jan i.
> >
> > >
> > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> approval
> > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > >
> > > > The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > >
> > > > If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > concerns:
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> copyright
> > > and
> > > > > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > > tests.
> > > > >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
> of
> > > > their
> > > > > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > code.
> > > > >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> are
> > > for
> > > > > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > > > purposes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs 0.5.0)
> > > > >
> > > > > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> > the
> > > > > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> the
> > > > > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > candidates
> > > so
> > > > > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > candidate
> > > > > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > > Apache
> > > > > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > For
> > > > > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > > > > strategy thus far:
> > > > >
> > > > > our m1 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > (approved)
> > > > -->
> > > > > and distributed as
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > > > distributed as
> > > > >
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > process.
> > > > >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > external
> > > > > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs
> > > > > > 0.5.0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > > release
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> > have
> > > > > passed
> > > > > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> with
> > > over
> > > > > 100
> > > > > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
> our
> > > > > > previous
> > > > > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> > license
> > > > and
> > > > > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > > that
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > > > > +5 binding
> > > > > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Jacques
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> something
> > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > approves
> > that release:
> >
> > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > directories" [1]
> >
> > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
> > of information:
> >
> > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > make available release candidates. " [1]
> >
> I do agree with your POW. Important is:
> - The release bits are in SVN
> - The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.
>
> dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
> mandatory location to use for the vote itself.
>
>
Hmm Ok, now that I re-read the maven and release policy at [1] and [2], I
guess it's a wherever it ends up type of thing.

With that said, I'll switch to a +1

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
[2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc


>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
> >
> > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
> > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > >
> > > The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > >
> > > If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> concerns:
> > > >
> > > > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > >
> > > > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright
> > and
> > > > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > >
> > > > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > >
> > > > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > tests.
> > > >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> > > their
> > > > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> code.
> > > >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> > for
> > > > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > > purposes.
> > > >
> > > > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > vs 0.5.0)
> > > >
> > > > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> the
> > > > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> > > > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> candidates
> > so
> > > > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> candidate
> > > > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > Apache
> > > > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> For
> > > > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > > > strategy thus far:
> > > >
> > > > our m1 release:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > > and distributed as
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > >
> > > > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> > -->
> > > > distributed as
> > > >
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > >
> > > > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> process.
> > > >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > external
> > > > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > release.
> > > >
> > > > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > vs
> > > > > 0.5.0)
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > release
> > > > to
> > > > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> have
> > > > passed
> > > > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with
> > over
> > > > 100
> > > > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> > > > > previous
> > > > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> license
> > > and
> > > > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > that
> > > > are
> > > > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > > > +5 binding
> > > > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Jacques
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.

On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something
> on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> approves
> that release:
>
> "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> directories" [1]
>
> For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
> of information:
>
> "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> make available release candidates. " [1]
>
I do agree with your POW. Important is:
- The release bits are in SVN
- The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.

dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
mandatory location to use for the vote itself.


rgds
jan i.

>
> To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
> here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
>
> Thanks,
> Jacques
>
> [1]
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I have to vote -1
> >
> > The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> >
> > If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:
> > >
> > > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > >
> > > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright
> and
> > > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > >
> > > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > >
> > > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> tests.
> > >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> > their
> > > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
> > >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> for
> > > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > purposes.
> > >
> > > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > vs 0.5.0)
> > >
> > > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of the
> > > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> > > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release candidates
> so
> > > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release candidate
> > > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> Apache
> > > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.  For
> > > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > > strategy thus far:
> > >
> > > our m1 release:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4 (approved)
> > -->
> > > and distributed as
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > >
> > > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> -->
> > > distributed as
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > >
> > > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > >
> > >
> > > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting process.
> > >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> external
> > > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > >
> > > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > release.
> > >
> > > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > vs
> > > > 0.5.0)
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > release
> > > to
> > > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have
> > > passed
> > > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with
> over
> > > 100
> > > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > >
> > > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> > > > previous
> > > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license
> > and
> > > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> that
> > > are
> > > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > > +5 binding
> > > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.

As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something
on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves
that release:

"Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
directories" [1]

For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
of information:

"It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
make available release candidates. " [1]

To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
this must be staged on dist.apache.org?

Thanks,
Jacques

[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote







On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry, I have to vote -1
>
> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
>
> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:
> >
> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> >
> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and
> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> >
> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> >
> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit tests.
> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> their
> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are for
> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > purposes.
> >
> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> (0.5.0.rc2
> > vs 0.5.0)
> >
> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of the
> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release candidates so
> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release candidate
> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the Apache
> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.  For
> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > strategy thus far:
> >
> > our m1 release:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4 (approved)
> -->
> > and distributed as
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> >
> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved) -->
> > distributed as
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> >
> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> >
> >
> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting process.
> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that external
> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> >
> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> release.
> >
> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > Jacques
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> (0.5.0.rc2
> > vs
> > > 0.5.0)
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> release
> > to
> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have
> > passed
> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over
> > 100
> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > >
> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> > > previous
> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license
> and
> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that
> > are
> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > >
> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > +5 binding
> > > > +6 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > >
> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.

Sorry, I have to vote -1

The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )

If this gets moved, I can vote +1

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:
>
> >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
>
> The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and
> licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
>
> >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
>
> These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit tests.
>  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of their
> small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
>  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are for
> all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> purposes.
>
> >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2
> vs 0.5.0)
>
> The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of the
> Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release candidates so
> that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release candidate
> hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the Apache
> distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.  For
> historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> strategy thus far:
>
> our m1 release:
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4 (approved) -->
> and distributed as
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
>
> our 0.4.0 release:
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved) -->
> distributed as
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
>
> our 0.5.0 release:
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
>
>
> As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting process.
>  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that external
> consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
>
> Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our release.
>
> thanks again for your feedback,
> Jacques
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2
> vs
> > 0.5.0)
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release
> to
> > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have
> passed
> > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over
> 100
> > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > >
> > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> > previous
> > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license and
> > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that
> are
> > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > >
> > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > The vote passed with:
> > > +5 binding
> > > +6 non-binding
> > >
> > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > >
> > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.

Hi John,

Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:

>>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.

The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and
licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.

>>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.

These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit tests.
 They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of their
small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
 These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are for
all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing purposes.

>> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2
vs 0.5.0)

The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of the
Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release candidates so
that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release candidate
hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the Apache
distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.  For
historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
strategy thus far:

our m1 release:
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4 (approved) -->
and distributed as
https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/

our 0.4.0 release:
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved) -->
distributed as
https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/

our 0.5.0 release:
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)

As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting process.
 Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that external
consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.

Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our release.

thanks again for your feedback,
Jacques

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs
> 0.5.0)
>
> John
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
> > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have passed
> > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100
> > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> >
> > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our
> previous
> > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license and
> > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that are
> > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> >
> > The vote thread can be found here:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The vote passed with:
> > +5 binding
> > +6 non-binding
> >
> > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> >
> > I look forward to your feedback.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs
0.5.0)

John


On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
> the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have passed
> our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100
> JIRAs closed in the last month.
>
> As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our previous
> release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license and
> notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that are
> distributed as part of our convenience binary.
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The vote passed with:
> +5 binding
> +6 non-binding
>
> You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
>
> I look forward to your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Jacques
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.

+1 (binding)

Others have checked signatures and conducted functional tests (and noted
tiny discrepancies on the web-site build instructions).  I have used this
software from the master branch quite recently.  As such, I focussed on
non-functional aspects of the distro.

This looks like a very clean and mature release.  I think the project
should graduate.


Source
=======

Check dependency file exists
Check Disclaimer
Checked license statement and notice for time64
Checked that signing key appears in public key servers
Checked README, INSTALL
Ran rat,
    recursively inspected all poms for out-of-bounds exceptions,
    found moot exclusion of sandbox/


Binary
======

Check LICENSE file exists and lists dependencies (did not check
list exhaustively, only spot-checked)
    CDDL licensed software is appropriately labelled, CDDL included in
    LICENSE, verified source code pointer and inclusion only in
    binary distro

    EPL licensed software is appropriately labelled, EPL included in
    LICENSE, verified source code pointer and inclusion only in binary
    distro

    WTFPL licensed software is noted.  WTFPL is clearly category A
    even though not listed on our web-page at
    http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html.




On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
> the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have passed
> our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100
> JIRAs closed in the last month.
>
> As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in our previous
> release from the general list.  This included enhancing our license and
> notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies that are
> distributed as part of our convenience binary.
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The vote passed with:
> +5 binding
> +6 non-binding
>
> You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
>
> I look forward to your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Jacques
>