You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ilya Kasnacheev (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/09/17 10:36:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-10389) Getting affinity for topology
version earlier than affinity is calculated
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ilya Kasnacheev resolved IGNITE-10389.
--------------------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
There's no information to differentiate this issue from IGNITE-11465, which is fixed. Resolving.
> Getting affinity for topology version earlier than affinity is calculated
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10389
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6
> Reporter: Arnaud Rivero
> Priority: Major
>
> When we deploy a new Ignite cluster on YARN and we deploy an Ignite service at the same time (by configuring it in the xml configuration file et putting it in the IGNITE_USERS_LIBS path), we get the following exception (the service name was replaced by XXXXXXXXXX):
>
>
> {code:java}
> [14:48:42,004][SEVERE][srvc-deploy-#144][GridServiceProcessor] Error when executing service: XXXXXXXXXX
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Getting affinity for topology version earlier than affinity is calculated [locNode=TcpDiscoveryNode [id=fd770768-189d-4374-82af-2497eff173da, addrs=[<addrs>], sockAddrs=[<sockAddrs>], discPort=47500, order=1, intOrder=1, lastExchangeTime=1542894520229, loc=true, ver=2.6.0#20180710-sha1:669feacc, isClient=false], grp=ignite-sys-cache, topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=2, minorTopVer=0], head=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=1], history=[AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=1, minorTopVer=0], AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=0], AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=1]]]
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.cachedAffinity(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:632)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.nodes(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:532)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.nodesByPartition(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:225)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByPartition(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:261)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByKey(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:252)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByKey(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:276)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.service.GridServiceProcessor$TopologyListener$1.run0(GridServiceProcessor.java:1828)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.service.GridServiceProcessor$DepRunnable.run(GridServiceProcessor.java:2015)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
>
> We found this previous issue and we wondered if we didn't meet an edge case of it :
> IGNITE-1171
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)