You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Christopher Smith (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/27 03:26:02 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-6106) QueryState.getTimestamp() & FBUtilities.timestampMicros() reads current timestamp with System.currentTimeMillis() * 1000 instead of System.nanoTime() / 1000

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christopher Smith updated CASSANDRA-6106:
-----------------------------------------

    Attachment: microtimstamp.patch

Here's proposed patch to HEAD that fixes at least the two cases I found immediately. Uses currentTimeMillis() & nanoTime() to get a precise but calibrated time stamp.
                
> QueryState.getTimestamp() & FBUtilities.timestampMicros() reads current timestamp with System.currentTimeMillis() * 1000 instead of System.nanoTime() / 1000
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6106
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>         Environment: DSE Cassandra 3.1, but also HEAD
>            Reporter: Christopher Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: collision, conflict, timestamp
>         Attachments: microtimstamp.patch
>
>
> I noticed this blog post: http://aphyr.com/posts/294-call-me-maybe-cassandra mentioned issues with millisecond rounding in timestamps and was able to reproduce the issue. If I specify a timestamp in a mutating query, I get microsecond precision, but if I don't, I get timestamps rounded to the nearest millisecond, at least for my first query on a given connection, which substantially increases the possibilities of collision.
> I believe I found the offending code, though I am by no means sure this is comprehensive. I think we probably need a fairly comprehensive replacement of all uses of System.currentTimeMillis() with System.nanoTime().

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira