You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de> on 2009/06/10 00:25:10 UTC
regression from 1.5.6
Hi all,
by accident, I've found a regression from 1.5.6.
It fails in trunk and 1.6.2, it succeeds in 1.5.6. And it's *really* basic
invocation.
(Haven't checked this out in detail yet.)
~Neels
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360770
Re: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
Posted by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de>.
Bert, see mail on the users@ list:
Re: Weird need for "svn update"
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2361070
Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr [mailto:neels@elego.de]
>> Sent: woensdag 10 juni 2009 15:07
>> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
>> Subject: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
>>
>> Sorry, false alarm, it seems like it's not a regression after all.
>>
>> It's either a bug or a confusing use case...
>> I'm still checking it out, just wanting to note that this was a false
> alarm.
>
> You should look at what version the working copy and dir, dir/foo are. (svn
> info or the new entry dump tool used by the test framework will help you).
>
> At that last commit wc is probably still at the initial version where dir
> wasn't added, so dir can't be removed.
>
> Bert
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360941
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2361085
RE: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
Posted by Bert Huijben <rh...@sharpsvn.net>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr [mailto:neels@elego.de]
> Sent: woensdag 10 juni 2009 15:07
> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
>
> Sorry, false alarm, it seems like it's not a regression after all.
>
> It's either a bug or a confusing use case...
> I'm still checking it out, just wanting to note that this was a false
alarm.
You should look at what version the working copy and dir, dir/foo are. (svn
info or the new entry dump tool used by the test framework will help you).
At that last commit wc is probably still at the initial version where dir
wasn't added, so dir can't be removed.
Bert
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360941
false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
Posted by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de>.
Sorry, false alarm, it seems like it's not a regression after all.
It's either a bug or a confusing use case...
I'm still checking it out, just wanting to note that this was a false alarm.
Sorry for the noise :P
~Neels
Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> by accident, I've found a regression from 1.5.6.
> It fails in trunk and 1.6.2, it succeeds in 1.5.6. And it's *really* basic
> invocation.
>
> (Haven't checked this out in detail yet.)
>
> ~Neels
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360770
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360914