You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whirr.apache.org by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/11 02:55:26 UTC
[VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
It fixes the following
issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
*** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.
Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
The tag to be voted
upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
My +1.
On 13 Δεκ 2011, at 6:36 π.μ., Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, David Alves <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> builds and packages cleanly.
>> tested chef service, passed.
>>
>> Great job on that last release push, Andrei.
>>
>> -david
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
>>
>>> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>>>
>>> It fixes the following
>>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>>>
>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>>> for convenience.
>>>
>>> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>>>
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted
>>> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>>>
>>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>>> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, David Alves <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> builds and packages cleanly.
> tested chef service, passed.
>
> Great job on that last release push, Andrei.
>
> -david
>
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
>
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following
>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>>
>>
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted
>> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>>
>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by David Alves <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
builds and packages cleanly.
tested chef service, passed.
Great job on that last release push, Andrei.
-david
On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>
> It fixes the following
> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>
>
> The tag to be voted
> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>
> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
First of all thanks for voting! I am now preparing a new RC that fixes the
binary release build problem.
Thanks David for providing a patch!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-449?focusedCommentId=13169718#comment-13169718
I think there are no other changes we need to make.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To be clear, this warning arises when slf4j apis are used without an slf4j
> implementation in the classpath.
>
> -A
> On Dec 13, 2011 12:47 PM, "Adrian Cole" <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Andrei.
> >
> > You can fix this by switching the binary dist to use something like
> > logback.
> >
> > -A
> > On Dec 13, 2011 12:43 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> All pre-release testing was done from my local machine with jdk6. I have
> >> now tested on a remote virtual
> >> machine running inside the Rackspace Cloud (Ubuntu 11.10 - jdk1.7.0_02):
> >>
> >> * build the binary artefacts from the source tarball with
> >> Maven 3.0.3 (empty maven local repository)
> >> * "Whirr in 5 minutes"
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else
> >> having
> >> CLI logging issues?
> >> It should be something easy to fix.
> >>
> >> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
> >> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
> >> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
> further
> >> details.
> >>
> >> Patrick do you think there are any other licensing issues?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -- Andrei Savu
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
> >> > good. Rat report looks fine.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
> >> > >
> >> > > It fixes the following
> >> > > issues:
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
> >> > >
> >> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> >> > > for convenience.
> >> > >
> >> > > Source and binary files:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven staging repo:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The tag to be voted
> >> > > upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
> >> > >
> >> > > Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> >> > > release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
To be clear, this warning arises when slf4j apis are used without an slf4j
implementation in the classpath.
-A
On Dec 13, 2011 12:47 PM, "Adrian Cole" <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Andrei.
>
> You can fix this by switching the binary dist to use something like
> logback.
>
> -A
> On Dec 13, 2011 12:43 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All pre-release testing was done from my local machine with jdk6. I have
>> now tested on a remote virtual
>> machine running inside the Rackspace Cloud (Ubuntu 11.10 - jdk1.7.0_02):
>>
>> * build the binary artefacts from the source tarball with
>> Maven 3.0.3 (empty maven local repository)
>> * "Whirr in 5 minutes"
>>
>> Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else
>> having
>> CLI logging issues?
>> It should be something easy to fix.
>>
>> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
>> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
>> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further
>> details.
>>
>> Patrick do you think there are any other licensing issues?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Andrei Savu
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
>> > good. Rat report looks fine.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Tom
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>> > >
>> > > It fixes the following
>> > > issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>> > >
>> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> > > for convenience.
>> > >
>> > > Source and binary files:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>> > >
>> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The tag to be voted
>> > > upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>> > >
>> > > Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> > > release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Andrei.
You can fix this by switching the binary dist to use something like logback.
-A
On Dec 13, 2011 12:43 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All pre-release testing was done from my local machine with jdk6. I have
> now tested on a remote virtual
> machine running inside the Rackspace Cloud (Ubuntu 11.10 - jdk1.7.0_02):
>
> * build the binary artefacts from the source tarball with
> Maven 3.0.3 (empty maven local repository)
> * "Whirr in 5 minutes"
>
> Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else having
> CLI logging issues?
> It should be something easy to fix.
>
> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further
> details.
>
> Patrick do you think there are any other licensing issues?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
> > good. Rat report looks fine.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tom
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
> > >
> > > It fixes the following
> > > issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> > > for convenience.
> > >
> > > Source and binary files:
> > http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted
> > > upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
> > >
> > > Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0 - logging
Posted by Adrian Cole <ad...@jclouds.org>.
+1 in the case of the cli, choosing a specific slf4j impl makes sense,
and it should be consistent between test and runtime
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Alex Heneveld
<Al...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
> Andrei-
>
> I'm thinking we need to add <scope>runtime</scope> to the slf4j-log4j12
> dependency in cli/pom.xml. Am testing it now.
>
> My reasoning: most of the poms rightly give <scope>test</scope> to that
> logging-implementation dependency. However cli (and example) give it the
> default scope which is "compile" which works fine until we combine it. In
> the presence of multiple scopes, "test" seems to trump "compile"
> (surprisingly to me). "runtime" however trumps both. This according to
> [1].
>
> Best
> Alex
>
> [1]
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope
>
>
> On 13/12/2011 20:42, Andrei Savu wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else
>> having
>> CLI logging issues?
>> It should be something easy to fix.
>>
>> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
>> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
>> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further
>> details.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0 - logging
Posted by Alex Heneveld <Al...@CloudsoftCorp.com>.
Andrei-
I'm thinking we need to add <scope>runtime</scope> to the slf4j-log4j12
dependency in cli/pom.xml. Am testing it now.
My reasoning: most of the poms rightly give <scope>test</scope> to that
logging-implementation dependency. However cli (and example) give it
the default scope which is "compile" which works fine until we combine
it. In the presence of multiple scopes, "test" seems to trump "compile"
(surprisingly to me). "runtime" however trumps both. This according to
[1].
Best
Alex
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope
On 13/12/2011 20:42, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else having
> CLI logging issues?
> It should be something easy to fix.
>
> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further
> details.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patrick do you think there are any other licensing issues?
I formulated my response while your email was in transit. I just +1'd
- the tests pass for me and I don't see any licensing issues with the
source artifact.
Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
All pre-release testing was done from my local machine with jdk6. I have
now tested on a remote virtual
machine running inside the Rackspace Cloud (Ubuntu 11.10 - jdk1.7.0_02):
* build the binary artefacts from the source tarball with
Maven 3.0.3 (empty maven local repository)
* "Whirr in 5 minutes"
Unfortunately I am not happy with the binary release. Is anyone else having
CLI logging issues?
It should be something easy to fix.
SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further
details.
Patrick do you think there are any other licensing issues?
Thanks,
-- Andrei Savu
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
> good. Rat report looks fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
> >
> > It fixes the following
> > issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
> >
> >
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> > for convenience.
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
> >
> >
> > The tag to be voted
> > upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
> >
> > Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
> good. Rat report looks fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following
>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>>
>>
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted
>> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>>
>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
+1
Checksums and signatures are correct. License and notice files look
good. Rat report looks fine.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>
> It fixes the following
> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>
>
> The tag to be voted
> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>
> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.7.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (non binding)
I run some tests with Cassandra, it looks good.
Regards
JB
On 12/11/2011 02:55 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0.
>
> It fixes the following
> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 14.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-317/
>
>
> The tag to be voted
> upon:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0
>
> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com