You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.INVALID> on 2023/07/26 07:03:39 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Boudjelda Mohamed Said <bm...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed 26 Jul 2023 at 09:04, Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
>
RE: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.INVALID>.
Thanks for the votes everyone.
Closing this voting for KIP and moving it to adopted section.
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 9:55 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
It looks like the KIP has been updated to say that the builds are nighly. With this change I am +1 (binding).
Thanks for working on this, Vaibhav. I believe you can close the vote and mark this KIP as passed, unless anyone else has comments. Maybe give a day or two and then close it out.
As a side note: if you have information about what does and does not work on PPC at the moment, maybe consider posting it to the mailing list. It would be interesting to know.
best,
Colin
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 02:14, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> Thanks for your response. I have updated the test plan accordingly.
>
> Do we have to vote out on the KIP again? We already have 3 +1 binding
> votes on KIP
>
> Thanks,
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 11:34 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these
> tests nightly instead of on every merge to trunk.
>
> On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare
> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Colin,
>> I do agree with you on running a nightly job.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vaibhav Nazare
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM
>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>>
>> I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we
>> can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1.
>> It's tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a
>> long time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad
>> thing, and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly
>> to things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
>>
>> best,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
>> > Hi Colin
>> >
>> > Can we continue the voting process now?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Vaibhav Nazare
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
>> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>> >
>> > Hey Colin
>> >
>> > I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
>> > average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
>> > Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
>> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
>> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
>> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
>> > this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Divij Vaidya
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>> >>
>> >> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all
>> wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But
>> looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the
>> results of these discussions.
>> >>
>> >> best,
>> >> Colin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
>> >> > +1 (binding)
>> >> > Thanks for the KIP!
>> >> >
>> >> > Mickael
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya
>> >> > <di...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +1 (binding)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Divij Vaidya
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
>> >> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
>>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
It looks like the KIP has been updated to say that the builds are nighly. With this change I am +1 (binding).
Thanks for working on this, Vaibhav. I believe you can close the vote and mark this KIP as passed, unless anyone else has comments. Maybe give a day or two and then close it out.
As a side note: if you have information about what does and does not work on PPC at the moment, maybe consider posting it to the mailing list. It would be interesting to know.
best,
Colin
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 02:14, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> Thanks for your response. I have updated the test plan accordingly.
>
> Do we have to vote out on the KIP again? We already have 3 +1 binding
> votes on KIP
>
> Thanks,
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 11:34 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these
> tests nightly instead of on every merge to trunk.
>
> On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Colin,
>> I do agree with you on running a nightly job.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vaibhav Nazare
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM
>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>>
>> I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we
>> can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's
>> tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long
>> time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing,
>> and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly to
>> things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
>>
>> best,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
>> > Hi Colin
>> >
>> > Can we continue the voting process now?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Vaibhav Nazare
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
>> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>> >
>> > Hey Colin
>> >
>> > I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
>> > average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
>> > Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
>> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
>> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
>> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
>> > this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Divij Vaidya
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>> >>
>> >> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all
>> wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But
>> looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the
>> results of these discussions.
>> >>
>> >> best,
>> >> Colin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
>> >> > +1 (binding)
>> >> > Thanks for the KIP!
>> >> >
>> >> > Mickael
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya
>> >> > <di...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +1 (binding)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Divij Vaidya
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
>> >> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
>>
RE: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.INVALID>.
Hi Divij,
Thanks for your response. I have updated the test plan accordingly.
Do we have to vote out on the KIP again? We already have 3 +1 binding votes on KIP
Thanks,
Vaibhav Nazare
-----Original Message-----
From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 11:34 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these tests nightly instead of on every merge to trunk.
On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> I do agree with you on running a nightly job.
>
> Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly?
>
> Thanks
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we
> can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's
> tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long
> time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing,
> and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly to
> things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> > Hi Colin
> >
> > Can we continue the voting process now?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vaibhav Nazare
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
> >
> > Hey Colin
> >
> > I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
> > average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
> > Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
> > this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
> >
> > --
> > Divij Vaidya
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
> >>
> >> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all
> wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But
> looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the
> results of these discussions.
> >>
> >> best,
> >> Colin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >> >
> >> > Mickael
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya
> >> > <di...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1 (binding)
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Divij Vaidya
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
> >> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>.
I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these tests
nightly instead of on every merge to trunk.
On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> I do agree with you on running a nightly job.
>
> Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly?
>
> Thanks
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we can't
> compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's tough
> enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long time. The
> fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing, and not
> something we should make even worse. It leads directly to things like big
> PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> > Hi Colin
> >
> > Can we continue the voting process now?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vaibhav Nazare
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
> >
> > Hey Colin
> >
> > I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
> > average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
> > Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
> > this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
> >
> > --
> > Divij Vaidya
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
> >>
> >> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all
> wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But
> looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results
> of these discussions.
> >>
> >> best,
> >> Colin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >> >
> >> > Mickael
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1 (binding)
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Divij Vaidya
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
> >> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
>
RE: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.INVALID>.
Hi Colin,
I do agree with you on running a nightly job.
Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly?
Thanks
Vaibhav Nazare
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing, and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly to things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
best,
Colin
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> Hi Colin
>
> Can we continue the voting process now?
>
> Thanks
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> Hey Colin
>
> I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
> average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
> Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
> infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
> which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
> monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
> this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>>
>> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results of these discussions.
>>
>> best,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
>> > +1 (binding)
>> > Thanks for the KIP!
>> >
>> > Mickael
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Divij Vaidya
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
>> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing, and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly to things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times.
best,
Colin
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote:
> Hi Colin
>
> Can we continue the voting process now?
>
> Thanks
> Vaibhav Nazare
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
>
> Hey Colin
>
> I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an average
> we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
> Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
> infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
> which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
> monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add this
> new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>>
>> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results of these discussions.
>>
>> best,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
>> > +1 (binding)
>> > Thanks for the KIP!
>> >
>> > Mickael
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Divij Vaidya
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
>> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
RE: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Vaibhav Nazare <Va...@ibm.com.INVALID>.
Hi Colin
Can we continue the voting process now?
Thanks
Vaibhav Nazare
-----Original Message-----
From: Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Hey Colin
I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 .
Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>
> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results of these discussions.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > Mickael
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Divij Vaidya
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>.
Hey Colin
I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an
average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0.
Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for continuing to work on this.
>
> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results of these discussions.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > Mickael
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Divij Vaidya
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
> >> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
Thank you for continuing to work on this.
One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the results of these discussions.
best,
Colin
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Mickael
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> --
>> Divij Vaidya
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
>> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
Mickael
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
> <Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support
Posted by Divij Vaidya <di...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
<Va...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942