You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/14 16:55:48 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049215#comment-13049215 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929:
-----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482554/h-6929.patch
  against trunk revision 1135333.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/625//console

This message is automatically generated.

> RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6929
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ipc, security
>            Reporter: Sharad Agarwal
>            Assignee: Sharad Agarwal
>         Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch
>
>
> Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira