[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-11366) STC: callable (closure) property from super class

["Eric Milles (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Eric Milles updated GROOVY-11366:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
GROOVY-5705, GROOVY-5881, GROOVY-6324, GROOVY-9418

Consider the following:
{code:groovy}
abstract class A {
  Closure func = { x -> x }
}
class C extends A {
  Closure proc = { -> }
  @CompileStatic test() {
    func(123)
    proc()
  }
}

print(new C().test())
{code}

STC is happy with "proc()" but errors on "func(123)".  If a variable expression can be called without ".call" it should not matter the source of the variable.  Both method call expressions work fine without STC.

  was:
GROOVY-5881, GROOVY-6324, GROOVY-9418

Consider the following:
{code:groovy}
abstract class A {
  Closure func = { x -> x }
}
class C extends A {
  Closure proc = { -> }
  @CompileStatic test() {
    func(123)
    proc()
  }
}

print(new C().test())
{code}

STC is happy with "proc()" but errors on "func(123)".  If a variable expression can be called without ".call" it should not matter the source of the variable.  Both method call expressions work fine without STC.


> STC: callable (closure) property from super class
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11366
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Static Type Checker
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.21, 5.0.0-alpha-8, 4.0.21
>            Reporter: Eric Milles
>            Priority: Major
>
> GROOVY-5705, GROOVY-5881, GROOVY-6324, GROOVY-9418
> Consider the following:
> {code:groovy}
> abstract class A {
>   Closure func = { x -> x }
> }
> class C extends A {
>   Closure proc = { -> }
>   @CompileStatic test() {
>     func(123)
>     proc()
>   }
> }
> print(new C().test())
> {code}
> STC is happy with "proc()" but errors on "func(123)".  If a variable expression can be called without ".call" it should not matter the source of the variable.  Both method call expressions work fine without STC.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)