You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to site-dev@james.apache.org by rd...@apache.org on 2007/09/18 00:02:34 UTC
svn commit: r576601 - in /james/site/trunk/www/jsieve: ./ apidocs/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/class-use/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/class-use/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/exte...
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon Sep 17 15:02:04 2007
New Revision: 576601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576601&view=rev
Log:
Regenerated JSieve website. This is the first time I've updated a JAMES site so please jump in if I've not quite understood the right way. And Yes, it's a long time and a big commit...
[This commit notification would consist of 65 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
Re: svn commit: r576601 - in /james/site/trunk/www/jsieve: ./ apidocs/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/class-use/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/class-use/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/exte...
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
> rdonkin@apache.org ha scritto:
>> Author: rdonkin
>> Date: Mon Sep 17 15:02:04 2007
>> New Revision: 576601
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576601&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Regenerated JSieve website. This is the first time I've updated a JAMES site so please jump in if I've not quite understood the right way. And Yes, it's a long time and a big commit...
>
> Looking at this page:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/jsieve/index.html
> it didn't work. Don't know if the problem is simply some svn:mime-type
> missing or something in the generation phase.
>From a first check it seems that you removed some of the mime-types and
uploaded some bad images because of eol-stype and non-binary transfer.
I'm used to *not* use an svn aware tool to make the directory
synchronization so changes are seen as updates and svn properties for
existing files are kept.
I committed images again with correct properties and now the preview
does work.
The other issue I see is the missing code for Google Analytics and
missing "Mailet API" menu. This is probably because your
james-maven-skin dependency SNAPSHOT has not been updated.
A "known" issue is that the parent should be changed to
james-project:1.1 but unfortunately the released james-project:1.1:site
descriptor references the maven-skin 1.1-SNAPSHOT instead of the stable
one that we release (because of a maven bug we discovered later).
I think that this last issue will be solved soon when we'll try to
release jspf 0.9.5 (and james-project:1.2, this time with the correct
dependency).
I updated the m2 pom descriptor (it wasn't correctly generating sources
for me), regenerated the website and started the commit. Now I go to
sleep, hope the commit will succeed, or I'll retry tomorrow.
Tomorrow I'll also commit my updated pom.
Stefano
> I'm checking something now, and I'll better check tomorrow!
>
> Stefano
>
>> [This commit notification would consist of 65 parts,
>> which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r576601 - in /james/site/trunk/www/jsieve: ./ apidocs/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/class-use/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/
apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/class-use/ apidocs/org/apache/jsieve/commands/exte...
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
rdonkin@apache.org ha scritto:
> Author: rdonkin
> Date: Mon Sep 17 15:02:04 2007
> New Revision: 576601
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576601&view=rev
> Log:
> Regenerated JSieve website. This is the first time I've updated a JAMES site so please jump in if I've not quite understood the right way. And Yes, it's a long time and a big commit...
Looking at this page:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/jsieve/index.html
it didn't work. Don't know if the problem is simply some svn:mime-type
missing or something in the generation phase.
I'm checking something now, and I'll better check tomorrow!
Stefano
> [This commit notification would consist of 65 parts,
> which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]