You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> on 2012/08/17 07:34:13 UTC
Thoughts on KARAF-1718
Hi,
I have created and attached a patch for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
3.0.0.
It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
work on a couple more improvements that I have in mind.
Thoughts?
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Re: Thoughts on KARAF-1718
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1 if can make it to catch 3.0.0 release train.
Freeman
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-8-17, at 下午1:34, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created and attached a patch for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
>
> I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
> 3.0.0.
> It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
> work on a couple more improvements that I have in mind.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *
Re: Thoughts on KARAF-1718
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 3.0.0. For a start I like it as it is right now :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1, since we already had and still have so much un-discussed changes
> in the past ....
>
> 2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>> +1, we should be able to make that for 3.0.0
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 08/17/2012 07:34 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have created and attached a patch for:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
>>>
>>> I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
>>> 3.0.0.
>>> It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
>>> work on a couple more improvements that I have in mind.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
> Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Thoughts on KARAF-1718
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
+1, since we already had and still have so much un-discussed changes
in the past ....
2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> +1, we should be able to make that for 3.0.0
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/17/2012 07:34 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created and attached a patch for:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
>>
>> I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
>> 3.0.0.
>> It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
>> work on a couple more improvements that I have in mind.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Thoughts on KARAF-1718
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1, we should be able to make that for 3.0.0
Regards
JB
On 08/17/2012 07:34 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created and attached a patch for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
>
> I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
> 3.0.0.
> It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
> work on a couple more improvements that I have in mind.
>
> Thoughts?
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com