You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Gerolf Seitz <ge...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/09 14:12:23 UTC

javadoc for packages

now that we're on java5, i think we should also move the javadoc
for packages from package.html to package-info.java

any objections?

  Gerolf

Re: javadoc for packages

Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.

Nope go ahead...

On 4/9/08, Gerolf Seitz <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> now that we're on java5, i think we should also move the javadoc
>  for packages from package.html to package-info.java
>
>  any objections?
>
>
>   Gerolf
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

Re: javadoc for packages

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.

no

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Gerolf Seitz <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> now that we're on java5, i think we should also move the javadoc
> for packages from package.html to package-info.java
>
> any objections?
>
>  Gerolf
>