You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@ws.apache.org by Connie L <fi...@hotmail.com> on 2001/04/25 19:55:30 UTC
RE: MS client to Apache server
Hi Jean,
Thank you for the detail explanation. Will MS client lose any of its
capability or functionality using low level api? Does it require license
fee for IBM's WSTK? Thanks.
Connie
>From: "Jean-Louis Vila" <jl...@cosmosbay.com>
>Reply-To: <jl...@cosmosbay.com>
>To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
>Subject: RE: MS client to Apache server
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:48:03 +0200
>
>Hi all,
>
>Here my answer:
> - WSDL is required when the MS client uses HIGH-Level API
> - WSDL is not required when the MS client uses LOW-Level API
> - Current version of Apache SOAP (2.1) doesn't include wizards
> to make WSDL file automatically
>
>I use WSTK 2.2 including several wizards which:
> - from a java class, makes a WSDL file (in reality 2 files!!) and the
>deploymentDescriptor for Apache SOAP (SOAP4J)
> - from WSDL file, makes java client proxy with or without java server
>
>There is some minor changes to do (object naming in deploymentDescriptor)
>but 99,9% of works is done automatically....
>
>And now, interoperability has never been so closer (I make a client MS and
>Apache SOAP
>server) !!!
>
>Jean-Louis
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : David Wall [mailto:dwall@Yozons.com]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 25 avril 2001 18:32
> > Ŕ : soap-user@xml.apache.org
> > Objet : Re: MS client to Apache server
> >
> >
> > > Depends on whether the client uses the MS SOAP high level or low level
> > api.
> >
> > Well, what would Connie use if they were using the high level
> > API, and what
> > would she use if they were using the low level API? I'm sure this is a
> > generic question anybody who creates a SOAP service will come to -- how
>to
> > share the interface to others.
> >
> > At this point, I'd guess many people may find it easiest to work with
>"raw
> > information" as presented on X Methods: http://www.xmethods.com/
> > I don't
> > think the current apache soap can generate WSDL authomatically, but it
> > appears that the axis project has plans for it, though I have no idea
>when
> > they will have a release that's working as well as soap2.1.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org
> >
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: MS client to Apache server
Posted by David Wall <dw...@Yozons.com>.
> Does it require license fee for IBM's WSTK
>From what I can see, you can't even use it in a commercial environment. I'd
guess that also means that you can't yet purchase a license since it's still
alpha code.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: MS client to Apache server
Posted by David Wall <dw...@Yozons.com>.
> Does it require license fee for IBM's WSTK
>From what I can see, you can't even use it in a commercial environment. I'd
guess that also means that you can't yet purchase a license since it's still
alpha code.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org