You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Tomoko Uchida (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/29 03:11:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8566) Deprecate methods in CustomAnalyzer.Builder which take factory classes

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tomoko Uchida resolved LUCENE-8566.
-----------------------------------
      Assignee: Tomoko Uchida  (was: Uwe Schindler)
    Resolution: Won't Fix

> Deprecate methods in CustomAnalyzer.Builder which take factory classes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8566
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8566
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/analysis
>            Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
>            Assignee: Tomoko Uchida
>            Priority: Minor
>
> CustomAnalyzer.Builder has methods which take implementation classes as follows.
>  - withTokenizer(Class<? extends TokenizerFactory> factory, String... params)
>  - withTokenizer(Class<? extends TokenizerFactory> factory, Map<String,String> params)
>  - addTokenFilter(Class<? extends TokenFilterFactory> factory, String... params)
>  - addTokenFilter(Class<? extends TokenFilterFactory> factory, Map<String,String> params)
>  - addCharFilter(Class<? extends CharFilterFactory> factory, String... params)
>  - addCharFilter(Class<? extends CharFilterFactory> factory, Map<String,String> params)
> Since the builder also has methods which take service names, it seems like that above methods are unnecessary and a little bit misleading. Giving symbolic names is preferable to implementation factory classes, but for now, users can write code depending on implementation classes.
> What do you think about deprecating those methods (adding {{@Deprecated}} annotations) and deleting them in the future releases? Those are called by only test cases so deleting them should have no impact on current lucene/solr codebase.
> If this proposal gains your consent, I will create a patch. (Let me know if I missed some point. I'll close it.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org