You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/28 16:19:36 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Jean-Baptiste,
Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
released anything, especially if there are significant
bugs/improvements in the newer version.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM, <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: jbonofre
> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
> New Revision: 1028290
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
> Log:
> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>
> Modified:
> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
> - <jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
> + <jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Jean-Baptiste,
Yeah, I'd avoid having the two of them around at runtime. If we end
up having to include our own Camel features.xml again anyway for
something else, it might be good to come back to this and pick it up
anyway, but for now, it probably makes sense to pick 6.1.22 instead.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> It was my plan, but:
> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>
> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: jbonofre
>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
:)
On Oct 28, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Ah its the OSGi stuff, what else :)
>
> Yeah this is from Camel 2.5. in the camel-cxf feature.
> <bundle>mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jetty-bundle/6.1.22_1</bundle>
>
> If there is a never version at SMX bundle repo then we can upgrade,
> but to late for that for Camel 2.5. But sure for Camel 2.6.
>
>
> And camel-jetty feature is on Jetty 7.1
> <feature name='camel-jetty' version='2.6-SNAPSHOT'>
> <bundle>mvn:org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec/1.1.2</bundle>
> <bundle>mvn:org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-util/7.1.6.v20100715</bundle>
> ....
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>>
>> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
>> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>> It was my plan, but:
>>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>
>>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
>>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> FuseSource
>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Johan Edstrom
joed@opennms.org
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Ah its the OSGi stuff, what else :)
Yeah this is from Camel 2.5. in the camel-cxf feature.
<bundle>mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jetty-bundle/6.1.22_1</bundle>
If there is a never version at SMX bundle repo then we can upgrade,
but to late for that for Camel 2.5. But sure for Camel 2.6.
And camel-jetty feature is on Jetty 7.1
<feature name='camel-jetty' version='2.6-SNAPSHOT'>
<bundle>mvn:org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec/1.1.2</bundle>
<bundle>mvn:org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-util/7.1.6.v20100715</bundle>
....
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>
> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> It was my plan, but:
>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>
>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Well,
I propose the following plan:
1/ Jetty ServiceMix Bundle 6.1.22_x will be present in system repo and
used by Karaf (especially for web/war/webconsole features) and
ServiceMix (especially the servicemix-http component)
2/ Jetty 7.1.x bundle will be present in system repo too and used by
Camel (especially for the camel-jetty component)
Regarding this, I'm working on SMX4 features to replace the overrided
Camel feature by the Camel karaf platform one.
Regards
JB
On 10/28/2010 08:20 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> No problem Claus.
>
> I know for the Guillaume's work as I'm Karaf commiter too ;) but we
> can't wait for this enhancement as ServiceMix 4.3.0 will use Karaf 2.1.0
> (already released).
>
> As you said, I prefer to work on bundle "alignment" in ServiceMix.
>
> Let me work on it ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/28/2010 05:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> Hi Jean
>>
>> Sorry of posting directly to you on the dev forum but my gmail has
>> "Reply to all" as default.
>>
>> I have posted on the dev since and Camel 2.5 do have Jetty 6.1 in the
>> camel-cxf feature for OSGi.
>> But then again it would be nice to align that version number with SMX
>> if possible.
>>
>> But on the same time we know gnodet works on making karaf smarter in
>> terms of when installing features and being able to pick existing
>> bundles which fit.
>> So this we most likely be better in the future so camel-cxf feature
>> will be able to pickup and just use the jetty bundle already installed
>> by SMX.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Claus,
>>>
>>> regarding platform/karaf features, I quick checked and I've seen
>>> jetty6.bundle.version used.
>>>
>>> Let me check again :)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>>>>
>>>> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
>>>> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It was my plan, but:
>>>>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it
>>>>> means
>>>>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>>>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>>>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>>>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>>>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty
>>>>>>> performances.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
No problem Claus.
I know for the Guillaume's work as I'm Karaf commiter too ;) but we
can't wait for this enhancement as ServiceMix 4.3.0 will use Karaf 2.1.0
(already released).
As you said, I prefer to work on bundle "alignment" in ServiceMix.
Let me work on it ;)
Regards
JB
On 10/28/2010 05:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi Jean
>
> Sorry of posting directly to you on the dev forum but my gmail has
> "Reply to all" as default.
>
> I have posted on the dev since and Camel 2.5 do have Jetty 6.1 in the
> camel-cxf feature for OSGi.
> But then again it would be nice to align that version number with SMX
> if possible.
>
> But on the same time we know gnodet works on making karaf smarter in
> terms of when installing features and being able to pick existing
> bundles which fit.
> So this we most likely be better in the future so camel-cxf feature
> will be able to pickup and just use the jetty bundle already installed
> by SMX.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi Claus,
>>
>> regarding platform/karaf features, I quick checked and I've seen
>> jetty6.bundle.version used.
>>
>> Let me check again :)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>>>
>>> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
>>> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It was my plan, but:
>>>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>>
>>>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it
>>>> means
>>>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty
>>>>>> performances.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
---------------------------------
HomePage
http://www.nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
Contacts
jbonofre@apache.org
jb@nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
OpenSource
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
Apache ServiceMix
http://servicemix.apache.org
-----------------------------------
PGP : 17D4F086
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jean
Sorry of posting directly to you on the dev forum but my gmail has
"Reply to all" as default.
I have posted on the dev since and Camel 2.5 do have Jetty 6.1 in the
camel-cxf feature for OSGi.
But then again it would be nice to align that version number with SMX
if possible.
But on the same time we know gnodet works on making karaf smarter in
terms of when installing features and being able to pick existing
bundles which fit.
So this we most likely be better in the future so camel-cxf feature
will be able to pickup and just use the jetty bundle already installed
by SMX.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> regarding platform/karaf features, I quick checked and I've seen
> jetty6.bundle.version used.
>
> Let me check again :)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>>
>> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
>> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It was my plan, but:
>>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>
>>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it
>>> means
>>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty
>>>>> performances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>> URL:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>>>
>>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Claus,
regarding platform/karaf features, I quick checked and I've seen
jetty6.bundle.version used.
Let me check again :)
Regards
JB
On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>
> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> It was my plan, but:
>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>
>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
That is correct. We considered upgrading 2.5 to cxf 2.3 and jetty 7 about one week before the release and it was considered risky.
The vote for camel 2.5.0 ends in a few hours, and by the look of it it will pass.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On Oct 28, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>
> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> It was my plan, but:
>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>
>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> It was my plan, but:
> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>
> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it means
> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: jbonofre
>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: svn commit: r1028290 - /servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It was my plan, but:
- Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
- Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it
means that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
> 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
> released anything, especially if there are significant
> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: jbonofre
>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>> New Revision: 1028290
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances.
>>
>> Modified:
>> servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>> <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>> <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>> <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>> <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>> <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>
>>
>>