You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Michal Cukierman (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/08/01 12:24:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-11504) BundleResource fallback sling:resourceType should be consistent with JcrNodeResource

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17573734#comment-17573734 ] 

Michal Cukierman commented on SLING-11504:
------------------------------------------

I agree that there is no bug as such, therefore I've created this issue as an improvement. So the ticket could be named: "Make sling:resourceType property optional in BundleResource".

As you noticed API contract is met, but it's still important to try to use similar patterns in exact implementations.

 

My perspective here is that the client API should not know which Resource type it's working on. Dialogs implementation created in JCR Resource should work when the resource is a BundleResource or any other type of resource.

I've seen the comments in the PR. Let me create new one(s) shortly.

 

> BundleResource fallback sling:resourceType should be consistent with JcrNodeResource
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-11504
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11504
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Bundle Resource 2.3.4
>            Reporter: Michal Cukierman
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Screenshot 2022-07-29 at 17.35.04.png, image-2022-07-29-16-47-41-320.png
>
>
> *Background:*
> We work on Sling based CMS - [https://www.websight.io|https://www.websight.io/] . One of our current goals is to move /apps and /libs folders into bundle resources and get rid of JCR based sling scripting and configurations (JCR Installer). This is an alternative approach to CompositeNodeStore usage in order to support containerized environments, blue-green deployments, and separation of code, configuration, and data.
> To achieve this, we move components (and dialogs) definitions from JCR into bundles and make them work with the same APIs (like Sling Resource Merger).
>  
> *The problem:*
> JcrNodeResource and BundleResource use different mechanisms for calculating fallback sling:resourceType
>  * In JCR, Resource.getResourceType method is used to calculate resourceType if no explicit property is found in the repository. See [https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-jcr-resource/blob/72c105d67adc58ef1f4d43de78815fdcebb290b5/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/jcr/resource/internal/helper/jcr/JcrItemResource.java#L120]]
>  * In Bundles, sling:resourceType is always set in the constructor and later overwritten by the JSON properties, if available. See: |[https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-bundleresource-impl/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/bundleresource/impl/BundleResource.java#L91]
> It results in a different contract, in particular, it’s impossible to declare BundleResource with no sling:resorurceType property. The result can be observed in the following Groovy Script execution, where both nodes have no sling:resourceTypes declared:
> !image-2022-07-29-16-47-41-320.png|width=751,height=545!
> Incompatible BundleResource and JCRNodeResource contracts requires workarounds in multiple APIs (our internal APIs / SlingResource Merger API) or to do workarounds at the data level.
>  
> *Proposed solution:*
> I can reimplement BundleResource, so that sling:resourceType is calculated in the getter. This will result in a valid getResourceType() method contract with the possibility of having null sling:resourceType resource property.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)