You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> on 2011/09/17 03:32:34 UTC

Re: SVN commit branches/0.90@1171766

Agree, looks like accidental commit of nkeywal's change.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.90@1171766
>
>
> Looks like the wrong commit message. Talks about a test fix, but has HBASE-4195 changes.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> - Andy
>
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: SVN commit branches/0.90@1171766

Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.

Fixed with HBASE-4444.  I backed out the miscommit.  Thanks for
catching it Andrew.
St.Ack

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Agree, looks like accidental commit of nkeywal's change.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.90@1171766
>>
>>
>> Looks like the wrong commit message. Talks about a test fix, but has HBASE-4195 changes.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>