You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> on 2004/08/07 12:29:03 UTC
Repository status....
Hi Cocooners:
I read the Vadim mail:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109111483816838&w=2
This is valid?
I want to download Cocoon from the new repo and start to hack again. I
want to be sure from where I can download the current repo.
BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next friday?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: Ghent in October?
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> On 9 Aug 2004, at 08:08, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
>> Cool, this means that we have to discuss a lot in Ghent in October :-)
>
>
> That's great! :-) Any confirmation on the dates? Steven?
>
> I'll need to inform the boss about that...
>
> Pier
http://www.orixo.com/events/gt2004/
--
Reinhard
Re: Ghent in October?
Posted by Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@apache.org>.
On Aug 9, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> On 9 Aug 2004, at 08:08, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
>> Cool, this means that we have to discuss a lot in Ghent in October :-)
>
> That's great! :-) Any confirmation on the dates? Steven?
>
> I'll need to inform the boss about that...
http://www.orixo.com/events/gt2004/
Still lots of work to do, but dates are fixed at least.
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com
Ghent in October?
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
On 9 Aug 2004, at 08:08, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Cool, this means that we have to discuss a lot in Ghent in October :-)
That's great! :-) Any confirmation on the dates? Steven?
I'll need to inform the boss about that...
Pier
Re: Status of kernel
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2004, at 17:22, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
>> Pier, what's the current status of the new kernel?
>
>
> Up and running :-)
>
> Seriously, I had to concentrate in moving all our sites (15) to
> Cocoon, and got cornered up with this job (which is kinda neat, I
> mean, right now all IT Magazines by VNU/UK are running on Cocoon, so,
> I'm happy).
>
> The backend is already using the new kernel to provide the real XML
> repository of documents, and so far, it's working kinda neatly.
>
> I need to pick it back up as I identified a major design flaw in the
> way in which events are dispatched, and blocks are reloaded (that's a
> kind of a bummer), but should start hammering on that pretty soon...
>
> Events is vital for one other of our little projects, our NIO based
> proxy server.
>
> I think you'll see more happening around september, we have new staff
> starting (whohooo!) and once they're up to speed, we'll finally be in
> 3 working on VNU's Cocoon and XML Backend, which means more work both
> on the 2.2 branch (we're still having trouble with cache) and on the
> new kernel!
>
> Pier
Cool, this means that we have to discuss a lot in Ghent in October :-)
--
Reinhard
Re: Status of kernel
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
On 8 Aug 2004, at 17:22, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Pier, what's the current status of the new kernel?
Up and running :-)
Seriously, I had to concentrate in moving all our sites (15) to Cocoon,
and got cornered up with this job (which is kinda neat, I mean, right
now all IT Magazines by VNU/UK are running on Cocoon, so, I'm happy).
The backend is already using the new kernel to provide the real XML
repository of documents, and so far, it's working kinda neatly.
I need to pick it back up as I identified a major design flaw in the
way in which events are dispatched, and blocks are reloaded (that's a
kind of a bummer), but should start hammering on that pretty soon...
Events is vital for one other of our little projects, our NIO based
proxy server.
I think you'll see more happening around september, we have new staff
starting (whohooo!) and once they're up to speed, we'll finally be in 3
working on VNU's Cocoon and XML Backend, which means more work both on
the 2.2 branch (we're still having trouble with cache) and on the new
kernel!
Pier
Status of kernel
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
>> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> Ugo Cei dijo:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Il giorno 07/ago/04, alle 12:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next
>>>>> friday?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was online, and closed one bug (#30321), but keep in mind that, at
>>>> least in Europe, many people are on vacation in August and things are
>>>> not going to get any better next friday. I was able to contribute some
>>>> of my time, since I was on vacation but at home.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. A question:
>>>
>>> The main trunk is for the 2.2. This is the version with the new kernel
>>> based on Excalibur Fortress?
>>>
>>> Sorry, but I have a mess in my head about the new kernel.
>>
>>
>>
>> Carsten will upgrade 2.2 (trunk) to Fortress. In parallel Pier and
>> Ugo work on their proposals about a new fundament of Cocoon. We will
>> move both work into the whiteboard. Some time in the future we have
>> to agree on one of the three ways (Fortress, kernel or spring) but
>> now its time to learn what each alternative can do for us.
>
>
>
> A distinction should be made between the two levels of containers:
> 1/ a container for blocks (requiring hot deploy and wiring)
> 2/ a container for components within a block.
>
> The new kernel is in category 1 as could be Geronimo's GBeans (based
> on JMX) Merlin or OSGi (used in Eclipse 3.0)
>
> Fortress and Spring are in category 2. I just started an in-depth
> reading of Spring docs (starting with [1]) and must say I'm now almost
> sold to it. While reading, some random thoughts pop up giving me the
> feeling that writing an Avalon Framework compatibility layer should be
> feasible.
>
> Sylvain
>
> [1] http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=SpringFramework
>
Pier, what's the current status of the new kernel?
--
Reinhard
Re: Repository status....
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Ugo Cei dijo:
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 07/ago/04, alle 12:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next
>>>> friday?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was online, and closed one bug (#30321), but keep in mind that, at
>>> least in Europe, many people are on vacation in August and things are
>>> not going to get any better next friday. I was able to contribute some
>>> of my time, since I was on vacation but at home.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the info. A question:
>>
>> The main trunk is for the 2.2. This is the version with the new kernel
>> based on Excalibur Fortress?
>>
>> Sorry, but I have a mess in my head about the new kernel.
>
>
> Carsten will upgrade 2.2 (trunk) to Fortress. In parallel Pier and Ugo
> work on their proposals about a new fundament of Cocoon. We will move
> both work into the whiteboard. Some time in the future we have to
> agree on one of the three ways (Fortress, kernel or spring) but now
> its time to learn what each alternative can do for us.
A distinction should be made between the two levels of containers:
1/ a container for blocks (requiring hot deploy and wiring)
2/ a container for components within a block.
The new kernel is in category 1 as could be Geronimo's GBeans (based on
JMX) Merlin or OSGi (used in Eclipse 3.0)
Fortress and Spring are in category 2. I just started an in-depth
reading of Spring docs (starting with [1]) and must say I'm now almost
sold to it. While reading, some random thoughts pop up giving me the
feeling that writing an Avalon Framework compatibility layer should be
feasible.
Sylvain
[1] http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=SpringFramework
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Re: Repository status....
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>Ugo Cei dijo:
>
>
>>Il giorno 07/ago/04, alle 12:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>
>>>BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next friday?
>>>
>>>
>>I was online, and closed one bug (#30321), but keep in mind that, at
>>least in Europe, many people are on vacation in August and things are
>>not going to get any better next friday. I was able to contribute some
>>of my time, since I was on vacation but at home.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for the info. A question:
>
>The main trunk is for the 2.2. This is the version with the new kernel
>based on Excalibur Fortress?
>
>Sorry, but I have a mess in my head about the new kernel.
>
>
Carsten will upgrade 2.2 (trunk) to Fortress. In parallel Pier and Ugo
work on their proposals about a new fundament of Cocoon. We will move
both work into the whiteboard. Some time in the future we have to agree
on one of the three ways (Fortress, kernel or spring) but now its time
to learn what each alternative can do for us.
--
Reinhard
Re: Repository status....
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Ugo Cei dijo:
> Il giorno 07/ago/04, alle 12:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
>
>> BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next friday?
>
> I was online, and closed one bug (#30321), but keep in mind that, at
> least in Europe, many people are on vacation in August and things are
> not going to get any better next friday. I was able to contribute some
> of my time, since I was on vacation but at home.
Thanks for the info. A question:
The main trunk is for the 2.2. This is the version with the new kernel
based on Excalibur Fortress?
Sorry, but I have a mess in my head about the new kernel.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: Repository status....
Posted by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org>.
Il giorno 07/ago/04, alle 12:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
> BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next friday?
I was online, and closed one bug (#30321), but keep in mind that, at
least in Europe, many people are on vacation in August and things are
not going to get any better next friday. I was able to contribute some
of my time, since I was on vacation but at home.
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
Re: Repository status....
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi Cocooners:
>
> I read the Vadim mail:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109111483816838&w=2
>
> This is valid?
>
> I want to download Cocoon from the new repo and start to hack again. I
> want to be sure from where I can download the current repo.
Yep that is it. There were other messages around
that date on cocoon-dev too. Basically do ...
cd /usr/local/svn
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk cocoon
Ditto for any of the other ones that you might need.
> BTW, miss we the first friday? Can we reschedule it to the next friday?
Well it was on. See the Wiki home page. Ugo and Tim
and some others discussed good things. FirstFriday
is about gathering too, not just bug fixing.
I popped in from time-to-time but mainly had other
things happening.
Sure we could postpone it until next week ...
Do you have a topic in mind?
--
David Crossley