You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Tim-Christian Mundt <de...@tim-erwin.de> on 2010/06/01 12:46:15 UTC
JCR 2.0
Hi Norman,
you are doing great stuff with introducing JCR into James. However,
shouldn't we conform to the 2.0 specification? That would basically mean
to use JQOM or SQL2 instead of XPATH (although I really like XPATH).
Moreover, some of the methods used are deprecated, however, that's an
easy one, because they have replacements (e.g. getNodeByUuid() is now
getNodeByIdentifier()).
Regards
Tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JCR 2.0
Posted by Tim-Christian Mundt <de...@tim-erwin.de>.
Norman, relax, this was no request nor do I think this is urgent. Just a
thought due to the fact that the JCR stuff is new in James and should
use the newest stuff.
All the best for "life" :)
Tim
Am Dienstag, den 01.06.2010, 17:36 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
> Hi Tim,
>
> you are right we should remove deprecated usage. There is a jira for
> it but life keeps me busy atm...
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-119
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
>
> 2010/6/1 Tim-Christian Mundt <de...@tim-erwin.de>:
> > Hi Norman,
> >
> > you are doing great stuff with introducing JCR into James. However,
> > shouldn't we conform to the 2.0 specification? That would basically mean
> > to use JQOM or SQL2 instead of XPATH (although I really like XPATH).
> > Moreover, some of the methods used are deprecated, however, that's an
> > easy one, because they have replacements (e.g. getNodeByUuid() is now
> > getNodeByIdentifier()).
> >
> > Regards
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JCR 2.0
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>.
Hi Tim,
you are right we should remove deprecated usage. There is a jira for
it but life keeps me busy atm...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-119
Bye,
Norman
2010/6/1 Tim-Christian Mundt <de...@tim-erwin.de>:
> Hi Norman,
>
> you are doing great stuff with introducing JCR into James. However,
> shouldn't we conform to the 2.0 specification? That would basically mean
> to use JQOM or SQL2 instead of XPATH (although I really like XPATH).
> Moreover, some of the methods used are deprecated, however, that's an
> easy one, because they have replacements (e.g. getNodeByUuid() is now
> getNodeByIdentifier()).
>
> Regards
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org