You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/06 05:15:16 UTC

Re: BRAF / FileChannel / sun.nio.ch.Util

I don't think so.  The core of the ITC problem [2] was that we were
allocating a new buffer for each message.  We're more careful when
doing BRAF reads to use fixed-size buffers.

[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg13357.html

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Chris Burroughs
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CASSANDRA-2654 worked around a painful jdk bug [1]. In the course of
> trying to audit DirectByteBuffer use I've been trying to wrap my head
> around the interaction of BufferedRandomAccessFile and FileChannel.  I
> admit that I'm as confused by nio as ever, but FileChannelImpl does
> appear to use Util.releaseTemporaryDirectBuffer.
>
> Do we have to work around [1] in BRAF just as we now do for
> IncomingTcpConnection?
>
>
> [1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6210541
>



-- 
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://www.datastax.com