You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/17 22:08:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18965) Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor as an argument

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329562#comment-16329562 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-18965:
-------------------------------

Whats the story here [~uagashe]? You going to leave old implementation in place for 2.0.0 and not do this? If so, move out of beta-2? Move to 2.0.0 (general bucket for stuff that we'd like in 2.0.0 but won't do likely).

> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor as an argument
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Coprocessors
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>            Reporter: Umesh Agashe
>            Assignee: Umesh Agashe
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor as an argument. Also write example showing how coprocessors and batchMutate() can be used instead of RowProcessors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)