[CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.2 release (first try)

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

I'll redo the release with the updated license headers and I expect  
the warning fix.

thanks
david jencks

On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly  
>> disagree.  We have no reason I can see to avoid following maven  
>> defaults here.  With the exception of the main geronimo release,  
>> previously done through an arcane and IMO incomprehensible process,  
>> everything we've released in the last year or so has used the  
>> release plugin default tag locations of <artifactid>-<version>.
>
> I favor consistency with past releases. So, fall on the other side  
> of the fence. Following maven's default is simply following an  
> arbitrary decision that maven made. 'geronimo-2.2' seems to hold  
> little value to anyone... All that said, I'm not going to argue with  
> you.
>
> Once the source problems (that I've fixed in branches/2.2) are  
> fixed, looks like I'll be +1. Until then, I'm -1.
>
> I've also added a work-around to avoid the annoying WARN log  
> messages from DWR in branches/2.2. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885952&view=rev 
>  Wouldn't mind seeing that picked up, but it's not necessary...
>
> --kevan