You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/03 02:11:29 UTC
2.1 builds
Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we just
missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
rolling. I was looking at:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is
there anything we can do to make that process easier?
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in there,
> and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing with
> the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release right?
>
>
>
Looks like struts-annotations-1.0.4 also needs to be released first as
we're working off a snapshot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
They seem to be working, at least for me.
musachy
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
> Musachy,
>
> if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied
> fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until the
> weekend.
>
> Let me know, if something else needs to be done.
>
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
> > From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in
> > there,
> > and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing
> > with
> > the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release
> right?
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
> > jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >>
> >>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we
> >>> just
> >>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
> >>> rolling. I was looking at:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
> >>>
> >>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is
> >>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
> >>>
> >>> musachy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
> >> time).
> >> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't
> >> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2 so
> >> there may be a few new issues.
> >>
> >> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
> >> had
> >> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although
> >> I
> >> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked all
> >> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from a
> >> US-based server.
> >> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
> >> for
> >> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just
> >> an
> >> administrative decision to release them.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
>
> --
> Rainer Hermanns
> aixcept
> Mariahilfstrasse 9
> 52062 Aachen - Germany
> w: http://aixcept.de/
> t: +49-241-4012247
> m: +49-170-3432912
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.struts2.views.freemarker.FreemarkerManager.getConfiguration(FreemarkerManager.java:159)
at
org.apache.struts2.components.template.FreemarkerTemplateEngine.renderTemplate(FreemarkerTemplateEngine.java:90)
at org.apache.struts2.components.UIBean.mergeTemplate(UIBean.java:558)
at
org.apache.struts2.components.ClosingUIBean.start(ClosingUIBean.java:59)
at
org.apache.struts2.views.jsp.ComponentTagSupport.doStartTag(ComponentTagSupport.java:53)
at
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.decorators.main_jsp._jspx_meth_s_005fa_005f0(main_jsp.java:337)
at
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.decorators.main_jsp._jspService(main_jsp.java:134)
at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just remembered that something seems to be broken with the old filter in
> trunk, Freemarker throws some NPEs.
>
> musachy
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>wrote:
>
>> I'll crosscheck this, too.
>>
>> Am Mi, 3.09.2008, 08:09, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
>> > Musachy,
>> >
>> > if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied
>> > fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until
>> the
>> > weekend.
>> >
>> > Let me know, if something else needs to be done.
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > Rainer
>> >
>> >> From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in
>> >> there,
>> >> and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing
>> >> with
>> >> the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release
>> >> right?
>> >>
>> >> musachy
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
>> >> jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we
>> >>>> just
>> >>>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
>> >>>> rolling. I was looking at:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me).
>> >>>> Is
>> >>>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> musachy
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
>> >>> time).
>> >>> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but
>> haven't
>> >>> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2
>> >>> so
>> >>> there may be a few new issues.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
>> >>> had
>> >>> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true),
>> although
>> >>> I
>> >>> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked
>> >>> all
>> >>> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from
>> >>> a
>> >>> US-based server.
>> >>> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
>> >>> for
>> >>> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just
>> >>> an
>> >>> administrative decision to release them.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rainer Hermanns
>> > aixcept
>> > Mariahilfstrasse 9
>> > 52062 Aachen - Germany
>> > w: http://aixcept.de/
>> > t: +49-241-4012247
>> > m: +49-170-3432912
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rene Gielen | http://it-neering.net/
>> Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A
>> Germany | gielen at it-neering.net
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I just remembered that something seems to be broken with the old filter in
trunk, Freemarker throws some NPEs.
musachy
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> I'll crosscheck this, too.
>
> Am Mi, 3.09.2008, 08:09, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
> > Musachy,
> >
> > if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied
> > fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until
> the
> > weekend.
> >
> > Let me know, if something else needs to be done.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Rainer
> >
> >> From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in
> >> there,
> >> and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing
> >> with
> >> the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release
> >> right?
> >>
> >> musachy
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
> >> jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we
> >>>> just
> >>>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
> >>>> rolling. I was looking at:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
> >>>>
> >>>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me).
> >>>> Is
> >>>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
> >>>>
> >>>> musachy
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
> >>> time).
> >>> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't
> >>> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2
> >>> so
> >>> there may be a few new issues.
> >>>
> >>> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
> >>> had
> >>> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although
> >>> I
> >>> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked
> >>> all
> >>> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from
> >>> a
> >>> US-based server.
> >>> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
> >>> for
> >>> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just
> >>> an
> >>> administrative decision to release them.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rainer Hermanns
> > aixcept
> > Mariahilfstrasse 9
> > 52062 Aachen - Germany
> > w: http://aixcept.de/
> > t: +49-241-4012247
> > m: +49-170-3432912
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rene Gielen | http://it-neering.net/
> Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A
> Germany | gielen at it-neering.net
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
I'll crosscheck this, too.
Am Mi, 3.09.2008, 08:09, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
> Musachy,
>
> if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied
> fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until the
> weekend.
>
> Let me know, if something else needs to be done.
>
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
>> From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in
>> there,
>> and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing
>> with
>> the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release
>> right?
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
>> jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we
>>>> just
>>>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
>>>> rolling. I was looking at:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
>>>>
>>>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me).
>>>> Is
>>>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
>>>>
>>>> musachy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
>>> time).
>>> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't
>>> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2
>>> so
>>> there may be a few new issues.
>>>
>>> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
>>> had
>>> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although
>>> I
>>> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked
>>> all
>>> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from
>>> a
>>> US-based server.
>>> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
>>> for
>>> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just
>>> an
>>> administrative decision to release them.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>
>
> --
> Rainer Hermanns
> aixcept
> Mariahilfstrasse 9
> 52062 Aachen - Germany
> w: http://aixcept.de/
> t: +49-241-4012247
> m: +49-170-3432912
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rene Gielen | http://it-neering.net/
Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A
Germany | gielen at it-neering.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de>.
Musachy,
if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied
fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until the
weekend.
Let me know, if something else needs to be done.
cheers,
Rainer
> From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in
> there,
> and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing
> with
> the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release right?
>
> musachy
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
> jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we
>>> just
>>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
>>> rolling. I was looking at:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
>>>
>>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is
>>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
>> time).
>> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't
>> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2 so
>> there may be a few new issues.
>>
>> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
>> had
>> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although
>> I
>> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked all
>> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from a
>> US-based server.
>> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
>> for
>> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just
>> an
>> administrative decision to release them.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Mariahilfstrasse 9
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49-241-4012247
m: +49-170-3432912
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
>From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in there,
and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing with
the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release right?
musachy
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans <
jeromy.evans@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we just
>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
>> rolling. I was looking at:
>>
>>
>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
>>
>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is
>> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
>>
>> musachy
>>
>>
>
> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my time).
> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't
> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2 so
> there may be a few new issues.
>
> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don had
> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although I
> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked all
> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from a
> US-based server.
> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than for
> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just an
> administrative decision to release them.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: 2.1 builds
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we just
> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1
> rolling. I was looking at:
>
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
>
> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is
> there anything we can do to make that process easier?
>
> musachy
>
I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my
time). I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but
haven't looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of
2.1.2 so there may be a few new issues.
Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don
had done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true),
although I skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and
sucked all enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to
build it from a US-based server.
I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than
for the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's
just an administrative decision to release them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org