You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/02/26 15:18:04 UTC
2.0-M3 - Building the release later today
Are there any outstanding issues with the branch that need to be
resolved that anyone is aware of? If not I'll cut the release for a
vote this evening.
Re: 2.0-M3 - Building the release later today
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
You might just rename 2.0-beta1 to 2.0-M3, then create a new 2.0-
beta1...
--jason
On Feb 26, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Ya, I'll remap the ones closed against beta-1 to M3 and close
> M2...thanks.
>
> On Feb 26, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Matt, when you release m3 today... what JIRA version does that map
>> to? Looks like some of the issues were for 2.0-beta-1, which
>> appears to be what 2.0-m3 is. It would be swell if you could keep
>> the JIRA version's in sync with reality.
>>
>> And along those lines be sure to mark 2.0-m2 as released with what
>> ever date it went out on... and do the same for 2.0-m3. This is
>> important to keep the JIRA roadmap/changelog feature functional.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:18 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any outstanding issues with the branch that need to be
>>> resolved that anyone is aware of? If not I'll cut the release
>>> for a vote this evening.
>>
>>
>
Re: 2.0-M3 - Building the release later today
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Ya, I'll remap the ones closed against beta-1 to M3 and close
M2...thanks.
On Feb 26, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Matt, when you release m3 today... what JIRA version does that map
> to? Looks like some of the issues were for 2.0-beta-1, which
> appears to be what 2.0-m3 is. It would be swell if you could keep
> the JIRA version's in sync with reality.
>
> And along those lines be sure to mark 2.0-m2 as released with what
> ever date it went out on... and do the same for 2.0-m3. This is
> important to keep the JIRA roadmap/changelog feature functional.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:18 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> Are there any outstanding issues with the branch that need to be
>> resolved that anyone is aware of? If not I'll cut the release for
>> a vote this evening.
>
>
Re: 2.0-M3 - Building the release later today
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Matt, when you release m3 today... what JIRA version does that map
to? Looks like some of the issues were for 2.0-beta-1, which appears
to be what 2.0-m3 is. It would be swell if you could keep the JIRA
version's in sync with reality.
And along those lines be sure to mark 2.0-m2 as released with what
ever date it went out on... and do the same for 2.0-m3. This is
important to keep the JIRA roadmap/changelog feature functional.
--jason
On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:18 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Are there any outstanding issues with the branch that need to be
> resolved that anyone is aware of? If not I'll cut the release for
> a vote this evening.