You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> on 2009/09/03 18:07:45 UTC
RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Ping Mentors/Daniel:
Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from the mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would greatly appreciate some buy in before proceeding.
-Ben Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Ping Mentors:
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC voting?
We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if we move metro over to trunk?
-Ben Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.
I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
Here's my vote +1.
-Ben Dewey
Mentors,
Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC voting?
Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Posted by Ming Jin <sk...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ben,
I've tested the Metro code, and it works fine and looks good in my machine
with SQL Server.
Kent, Harold,
Do you have any comments? If not, I'll resolve the tickets as #1.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Metro has been committed for over a week now, has anyone had a chance to
> take a look? Any comments/thoughts on Steps 1-4 below?
>
>
>
> Kent, Harold, Ming,
>
> If everything looks good can you resolve your tickets in JIRA. See #1
> below.
>
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 2:08 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> Metro has been moved over to the Trunk and the dotnet code to support it
> has also moved over. I tested it and it works fine.
>
> Thanks to everyone for you votes and help. Below are a few next steps that
> I can think of.
>
>
> Next Steps:
>
> 1. Test, Test, Test, and Resolve STONEHENGE-69,70,71,90,93
> 2. Update build scripts. I updated the windows .bat version, anyone
> running linux can you update the .sh?
> 3. Move documentation to WIKI
> 4. Add Metro to interop guide on Wiki
>
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: Ben Dewey
> Cc: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
>
> This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval.
> Could have even been done lazy consensus.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote:
> > Ping Mentors/Daniel:
> >
> > Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from
> the
> > mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would
> greatly
> > appreciate some buy in before proceeding.
> >
> > -Ben Dewey
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Dewey
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM
> > To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
> >
> > Ping Mentors:
> > > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> > > voting?
> >
> > We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if
> > we move metro over to trunk?
> >
> > -Ben Dewey
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Dewey
> > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM
> > To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> > Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've
> had
> > a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception
> of
> > some endpoint name conflicts.
> >
> > I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work
> the
> > METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can
> > test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be
> > addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
> >
> > Here's my vote +1.
> >
> > -Ben Dewey
> >
> >
> > Mentors,
> >
> > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> > voting?
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
--
Ming Jin
Consultant
Thoughtworks, Inc
Mobile: +44 07503 144174(London) +86 135 2125 6300(Beijing)
Gtalk: skyairmj@gmail.com
MSN: skyairmj@hotmail.com
Blog: http://blogjava.net/mingj
Twitter: https://twitter.com/mingjin
RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Posted by Nick Hauenstein <ni...@quicklearn.com>.
Hello Ben,
I tested the Metro implementation of the stock trader app that is in the trunk against the dotnet implementation (immediately after getting the latest revision of both), and have included the results below. I had a failure anytime I attempted to use any "OPSSEC" service. I included the final test (.NET for all layers) as a sanity test. It looks like there is something wrong with my configuration that may allow for some failures to be disregarded (unless anyone else can verify the same results).
Client BS OPS SEC? Result
METRO METRO METRO NO PASS
METRO METRO METRO YES FAIL [1]
METRO METRO DOTNET NO PASS
METRO METRO DOTNET YES FAIL [1]
METRO DOTNET METRO NO PASS
METRO DOTNET METRO YES FAIL [2]
METRO DOTNET DOTNET NO PASS
METRO DOTNET DOTNET YES FAIL [3]
DOTNET METRO METRO NO PASS
DOTNET METRO METRO YES FAIL [4]
DOTNET METRO DOTNET NO PASS
DOTNET METRO DOTNET YES FAIL [4]
DOTNET DOTNET DOTNET YES FAIL [3]
Hope this helps in some way!
- Nick
[1] Logged in successfully. Could view portfolio and account information. Buying and selling shares sent me back to login screen, and never completed successfully. The following error was recorded in the server logs each time:
Log Level WARNING
Logger javax.enterprise.system.stream.err
Name-Value Pairs _ThreadID=22;_ThreadName=DataHandler.getInputStream;_RequestID=e1507475-d159-4ebf-9ae0-01887769bb2d;
Record Number 526
Message ID com.sun.xml.wss.impl.XWSSecurityRuntimeException
Complete Message Unable to calculate cipher value as invalid key was provided at com.sun.xml.ws.security.opt.impl.enc.CryptoProcessor.encryptData(CryptoProcessor.java:241) at com.sun.xml.ws.security.opt.impl.enc.CryptoProcessor.encrypt(CryptoProcessor.java:126) at com.sun.xml.ws.security.opt.impl.util.CVDataHandler.writeTo(CVDataHandler.java:55) at javax.activation.ObjectDataContentHandler.writeTo(DataHandler.java:897) at javax.activation.DataHandler$1.run(DataHandler.java:279) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.security.InvalidKeyException: Illegal key size or default parameters at javax.crypto.Cipher.a(DashoA13*..) at javax.crypto.Cipher.a(DashoA13*..) at javax.crypto.Cipher.a(DashoA13*..) at javax.crypto.Cipher.init(DashoA13*..) at javax.crypto.Cipher.init(DashoA13*..) at com.sun.xml.ws.security.opt.impl.enc.CryptoProcessor.initCipher(CryptoProcessor.java:102) at com.sun.xml.ws.security.opt.impl.enc.CryptoProcessor.encryptData(CryptoProcessor.java:195) ... 5 more
[2] Saw the following error with a debugger attached to the Business Service while attempting to buy stocks:
MessageSecurityException was unhandled by user code.
An unsecured or incorrectly secured fault was received from the other party. See the inner FaultException for the fault code and detail.
[3] Saw the following error with a debugger attached to the Business Service while attempting to buy stocks:
SecurityNegotiationException was unhandled by user code
Secure channel cannot be opened because security negotiation with the remote endpoint has failed. This may be due to incorrectly specified EndpointIdentity in the EndpointAddress used to create the channel. Please verify the EndpointIdentity specified or implied by the EndpointAddress correctly identifies the remote endpoint.
[4] Encountered the following error when attempting to buy stocks:
Server Error in '/trade' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
com.sun.xml.ws.client.ClientTransportException: The server sent HTTP status code 500: Internal Server Error
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: com.sun.xml.ws.client.ClientTransportException: The server sent HTTP status code 500: Internal Server Error
Source Error:
Line 422: {
Line 423: this.Channel = null;
Line 424: throw;
Line 425: }
Line 426: }
Source File: c:\Stonehenge\stocktrader\dotnet\trader_client\BusinessServiceClient\BusinessServiceClient.cs Line: 424
Stack Trace:
[FaultException: com.sun.xml.ws.client.ClientTransportException: The server sent HTTP status code 500: Internal Server Error]
System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg) +7594687
System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type) +275
Trade.BusinessServiceContract.ITradeServices.sellEnhanced(String userID, Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) +0
Trade.BusinessServiceClient.BusinessServiceClient.sellEnhanced(String userID, Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) in c:\Stonehenge\stocktrader\dotnet\trader_client\BusinessServiceClient\BusinessServiceClient.cs:424
Trade.BusinessServiceClient.BSLClient.sell(String userID, Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) in c:\Stonehenge\stocktrader\dotnet\trader_client\BusinessServiceClient\BSLClient.cs:455
Trade.Web.Order.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in c:\Stonehenge\stocktrader\dotnet\trader_client\Trade\Order.aspx.cs:85
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +14
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +35
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +50
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +627
RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
Everyone,
Metro has been committed for over a week now, has anyone had a chance to take a look? Any comments/thoughts on Steps 1-4 below?
Kent, Harold, Ming,
If everything looks good can you resolve your tickets in JIRA. See #1 below.
-Ben Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 2:08 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Metro has been moved over to the Trunk and the dotnet code to support it has also moved over. I tested it and it works fine.
Thanks to everyone for you votes and help. Below are a few next steps that I can think of.
Next Steps:
1. Test, Test, Test, and Resolve STONEHENGE-69,70,71,90,93
2. Update build scripts. I updated the windows .bat version, anyone running linux can you update the .sh?
3. Move documentation to WIKI
4. Add Metro to interop guide on Wiki
-Ben Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:58 PM
To: Ben Dewey
Cc: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval.
Could have even been done lazy consensus.
Dan
On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote:
> Ping Mentors/Daniel:
>
> Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from the
> mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would greatly
> appreciate some buy in before proceeding.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> Ping Mentors:
> > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> > voting?
>
> We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if
> we move metro over to trunk?
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've had
> a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of
> some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work the
> METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can
> test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be
> addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
>
> Here's my vote +1.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> Mentors,
>
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> voting?
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
Metro has been moved over to the Trunk and the dotnet code to support it has also moved over. I tested it and it works fine.
Thanks to everyone for you votes and help. Below are a few next steps that I can think of.
Next Steps:
1. Test, Test, Test, and Resolve STONEHENGE-69,70,71,90,93
2. Update build scripts. I updated the windows .bat version, anyone running linux can you update the .sh?
3. Move documentation to WIKI
4. Add Metro to interop guide on Wiki
-Ben Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:58 PM
To: Ben Dewey
Cc: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval.
Could have even been done lazy consensus.
Dan
On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote:
> Ping Mentors/Daniel:
>
> Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from the
> mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would greatly
> appreciate some buy in before proceeding.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> Ping Mentors:
> > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> > voting?
>
> We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if
> we move metro over to trunk?
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've had
> a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of
> some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work the
> METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can
> test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be
> addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
>
> Here's my vote +1.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> Mentors,
>
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> voting?
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval.
Could have even been done lazy consensus.
Dan
On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote:
> Ping Mentors/Daniel:
>
> Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from the
> mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would greatly
> appreciate some buy in before proceeding.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> Ping Mentors:
> > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> > voting?
>
> We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if
> we move metro over to trunk?
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've had
> a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of
> some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work the
> METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can
> test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be
> addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
>
> Here's my vote +1.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> Mentors,
>
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC
> voting?
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog