You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/18 09:43:03 UTC

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.8, RC0

Unfortunately, CONNECTORS-1125 *is* serious enough that we will need a new
RC, I believe.

Karl


On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Abe-san,
>
> I've created CONNECTORS-1124 for this problem.  But I agree it is not
> worth a new RC for this reason alone.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Shinichiro Abe <
> shinichiro.abe.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> -Checked SIGS, checksum by running check_signatures.sh.
>> -'ant test' -> OK
>>
>> I have a question as to 1.8 and .2.0
>> - cd dist/example; java -jar start.jar --> It works fine as well as using
>> start.sh.
>> - cd dist/example-proprietary; java -jar start.jar --> currently throws
>> ClassNotFoundException about Derby jars or HSQLDB jars.
>> But start.sh works since this script reads start-options.env.unix which
>> has class paths of Derby or HSQLDB.
>>
>> What's the difference between example and example-proprietary above?
>> or
>> Would you like to remove the start.jar in example-proprietary?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shinichiro Abe
>>
>> On 2014/12/18, at 9:42, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Ran all tests.  Ran single-process example.  +1 from me.
>> >
>> > Karl
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 1.8, RC0.
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts can be found at:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apache-manifoldcf-1.8
>> >>
>> >> There is also a tag at:
>> >>
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/tags/release-1.8-RC0
>> >>
>> >> NOTE: This release contains more than 100 major fixes and
>> modifications.
>> >> The entire list can be seen in CHANGES.txt, and corresponds roughly in
>> >> functionality to MCF 2.0.  However, MCF 1.8 IS backwards compatible
>> with
>> >> MCF 1.x, unlike MCF 2.0.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Karl
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>