You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org> on 2005/10/28 04:04:08 UTC
[result] Re: [vote] Accept Trifork contribution into the sandbox
I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have Alan
itching to get it in the sandbox, and +1 votes from
geir, matt, sachin, dims, jeff, bruce, david j, hiram, alan and john
and no complaints or even concerns voiced about putting in sandbox as
far as I can tell, so I think Alan should go ahead.
If someone has a serious problem, we can always back it out. Speak
now if this is a problem for anyone.
geir
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
> with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it
> into the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the
> incubator if we accept.
>
> The code is here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1111
>
> [ ] Yes, bring into sandbox
>
> [ ] No
>
> geir
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
> geirm@apache.org
>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: [result] Re: [vote] Accept Trifork contribution into the sandbox
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
He already put it in.... I figure that's an oversight (the
noncompilation) that will get fixed Real Soon Now.
If "it compiles" was a requirement, we'd have to dump the Geronimo
tree out of SVN from time to time :)
geir
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:11 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Geir,
>
> I have a conditional +1. Lets be sure it is compilable before it
> goes in. We should wait to hear from Alan. Once he fully compiles
> it, then you can have my +1 back ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have
>> Alan itching to get it in the sandbox, and +1 votes from
>> geir, matt, sachin, dims, jeff, bruce, david j, hiram, alan and john
>> and no complaints or even concerns voiced about putting in sandbox
>> as far as I can tell, so I think Alan should go ahead.
>> If someone has a serious problem, we can always back it out.
>> Speak now if this is a problem for anyone.
>> geir
>> On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to
>>> play with and add to this software as we discuss this is to
>>> bring it into the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll
>>> register with the incubator if we accept.
>>>
>>> The code is here :
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1111
>>>
>>> [ ] Yes, bring into sandbox
>>>
>>> [ ] No
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
>>> geirm@apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: [result] Re: [vote] Accept Trifork contribution into the sandbox
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
The missing bits are CORBA "api" related so it's nothing big.
Regards,
Alan
On 10/27/2005 7:11 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Geir,
>
> I have a conditional +1. Lets be sure it is compilable before it goes
> in. We should wait to hear from Alan. Once he fully compiles it,
> then you can have my +1 back ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have Alan
>> itching to get it in the sandbox, and +1 votes from
>>
>> geir, matt, sachin, dims, jeff, bruce, david j, hiram, alan and john
>>
>> and no complaints or even concerns voiced about putting in sandbox
>> as far as I can tell, so I think Alan should go ahead.
>>
>> If someone has a serious problem, we can always back it out. Speak
>> now if this is a problem for anyone.
>>
>> geir
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
>>> with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it
>>> into the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the
>>> incubator if we accept.
>>>
>>> The code is here :
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1111
>>>
>>> [ ] Yes, bring into sandbox
>>>
>>> [ ] No
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
>>> geirm@apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [result] Re: [vote] Accept Trifork contribution into the sandbox
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.
Geir,
I have a conditional +1. Lets be sure it is compilable before it goes
in. We should wait to hear from Alan. Once he fully compiles it, then
you can have my +1 back ;-)
Jeff
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have Alan
> itching to get it in the sandbox, and +1 votes from
>
> geir, matt, sachin, dims, jeff, bruce, david j, hiram, alan and john
>
> and no complaints or even concerns voiced about putting in sandbox as
> far as I can tell, so I think Alan should go ahead.
>
> If someone has a serious problem, we can always back it out. Speak now
> if this is a problem for anyone.
>
> geir
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
>> with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into
>> the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the
>> incubator if we accept.
>>
>> The code is here :
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1111
>>
>> [ ] Yes, bring into sandbox
>>
>> [ ] No
>>
>> geir
>>
>> --
>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
>> geirm@apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>