You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Kevin Risden (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/02/23 14:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-16048) Examine Tika dependencies that brought in javax classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Kevin Risden reassigned SOLR-16048:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Kevin Risden
> Examine Tika dependencies that brought in javax classes
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16048
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: contrib - Solr Cell (Tika extraction)
> Reporter: Kevin Risden
> Assignee: Kevin Risden
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SOLR-15989 Tika 1.28.1 upgrade brought in some javax packaged classes which [~janhoy] caught with the smoketester. Details from [~janhoy] in SOLR-15989:
> {quote}This upgrade adds many parsers and dependencies. I ran the smoketester, which introspects every jar looking for illegal "java.{*}" and "javax.{*}" class files. These libararies were flagged by the smoke tester:
> {code:java}
> modules/extraction/lib/unit-api-1.0.jar" contains sheisty class "javax/measure/Dimension.class"
> modules/extraction/lib/jakarta.activation-1.2.2.jar" contains sheisty class "javax/activation/CommandInfo$Beans$1.class"
> modules/extraction/lib/jakarta.annotation-api-1.3.5.jar" contains sheisty class "javax/annotation/security/PermitAll.class"
> jakarta.xml.bind-api:2.3.3 {code}
> I believes all jakarta libs are OK license wise, but strangely they use the javax.xxx namespace instead of jakarta.xxx. The Units API (javax.measure.xxx) seems to be in the same category, that it is a JSR implemented with an allowed license.
> We have excluded several annotation jars elsewhere, that's why I raise this here.
> I assume the correct action is to make exceptions for these pacakges in the smoke tester. Any other insight?{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org