You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/08/01 05:19:03 UTC

Re: [PR] MINOR: [R] Work around test failure in tidyquery revdep [arrow]

conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #43498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43498#issuecomment-2262059754

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 0dec116d83e4160aa3387fa87be2a99ac0fd3390.
   
   There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `test-mac-arm` at [2024-07-31 23:30:44Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/803743ccdc434fbb8d9228a2430e28d1...a6356c29c283453dbcea15b855156199/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-06, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/066aab43bc4d722180007b63c42addf4...066aad08cdb37aaf8000b9f670d11412)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-11, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/066aab4ac59a7f4280007ad5368f4686...066aad10522271f4800010ebad7d8f05)
   - and 1 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/28195479788) has more details. It also includes information about 6 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org