You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Aihua Xu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/12 21:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-10984) When ZooKeeperHiveLockManager locks
an object exclusively, it doesn't check the lock on the children.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Aihua Xu updated HIVE-10984:
----------------------------
Description:
There is an issue in ZooKeeperHiveLockManager.java, in which when locking exclusively on an object we didn't check if the children are locked.
So the following should not be allowed.
{noformat}
use default;
lock table lockneg2.tstsrcpart shared;
lock database lockneg2 exclusive;
{noformat}
Also check the test case lockneg_try_lock_db_in_use.q to add more reasonable failure cases.
was:
There is an issue in ZooKeeperHiveLockManager.java, in which when locking exclusively on an object we didn't check if the children are locked.
So the following should not be allowed.
{noformat}
use default;
lock table lockneg2.tstsrcpart shared;
lock database lockneg2 exclusive;
{noformat}
> When ZooKeeperHiveLockManager locks an object exclusively, it doesn't check the lock on the children.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-10984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10984
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Locking
> Reporter: Aihua Xu
> Assignee: Aihua Xu
>
> There is an issue in ZooKeeperHiveLockManager.java, in which when locking exclusively on an object we didn't check if the children are locked.
> So the following should not be allowed.
> {noformat}
> use default;
> lock table lockneg2.tstsrcpart shared;
> lock database lockneg2 exclusive;
> {noformat}
> Also check the test case lockneg_try_lock_db_in_use.q to add more reasonable failure cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)