Re: XMLRPC 1.2 release date

[Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>]

Daniel Rall a écrit :

> Henri Gomez wrote:
> 
>> Did there is a release date for 1.2 ?
>>
>> The latest commit from Andrew match my need for BigDecimal support
>> but I'll have to use a release version in my work, not one from HEAD
>> (yes it's a shame but you know how IT managers are).
> 
> 
> I don't see any reason why 1.2 shouldn't be released, now that the 
> base64 encoding issue has been worked out.  However, did Andrew's recent 
> changes make it into the branch?  CVS HEAD will be 2.0.  I wouldn't be 
> adverse to seeing a 1.2 release of what's there, then a quick 1.3 which 
> backports Andrew's changes.  Of course, it might make more sense to do a 
> 2.0 release candidate instead of a 1.3.

Any news for 1.2 release ?

Re: XMLRPC 1.2 release date

[Sylwester Lachiewicz <mx...@plusnet.pl>]

Hi,

What you think about use jaxp parser to parse xml-rpc communication? This
will remove dependency to MinML.

Sylwester

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
To: <xm...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: XMLRPC 1.2 release date


Daniel Rall a écrit :

> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> Did there is a release date for 1.2 ?
>>
>> The latest commit from Andrew match my need for BigDecimal support
>> but I'll have to use a release version in my work, not one from HEAD
>> (yes it's a shame but you know how IT managers are).
>
>
> I don't see any reason why 1.2 shouldn't be released, now that the
> base64 encoding issue has been worked out.  However, did Andrew's recent
> changes make it into the branch?  CVS HEAD will be 2.0.  I wouldn't be
> adverse to seeing a 1.2 release of what's there, then a quick 1.3 which
> backports Andrew's changes.  Of course, it might make more sense to do a
> 2.0 release candidate instead of a 1.3.

Any news for 1.2 release ?