You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/26 01:21:21 UTC
maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
(jetty) mailing list?
Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
bunch of files in it by default.
Thanks,
Matt
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
You're talking about http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-32
On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I'm looking for is the ability to have a WAR that can act like a
> JAR. That is, any projects that depend on the WAR will inherit its
> dependencies. The current system basically requires me to publish a
> WAR w/o any dependencies and then make end-users projects include both
> a JAR and a WAR.
>
> If I was able to use a WAR as a JAR, and inherit all its dependencies,
> I could test and publish the WAR for download - and somehow exclude
> WEB-INF/lib from publishing/downloading. The dependencies would then
> be downloaded in the normal Maven way.
>
> As it stands, my understanding is its best to create the following:
>
> 1. JAR project that contains all the dependencies
> 2. WAR project that contains no dependencies, just static files
> 3. WAR project to test including both #1 and #2 since #2 can't really
> be tested since it has no dependencies.
>
> Is this the current recommended way to do this? While the transition
> to Maven 2 might be easier to end users, using the setup above seems
> like it might be a lot more complicated for folks hoping to contribute
> to AppFuse.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not
> >
> > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up
> > > the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib?
> > >
> > > I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so
> > > including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve
> > > the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c
> > > you won't get access to them anyway)?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Something like
> > > >
> > > > <plugin>
> > > > <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > <version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
> > > > <configuration>
> > > > <archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
> > > > </configuration>
> > > > </plugin>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <pluginRepositories>
> > > > <pluginRepository>
> > > > <id>apache.org</id>
> > > > <name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
> > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
> > > > <releases>
> > > > <enabled>false</enabled>
> > > > </releases>
> > > > </pluginRepository>
> > > > </pluginRepositories>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > > > > > my IDE.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > > > > > is a good one?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > > > > > - data
> > > > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > > > > > - service
> > > > > > > > > - web
> > > > > > > > > - common
> > > > > > > > > - common-war
> > > > > > > > > - jsf
> > > > > > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > > > > > - spring
> > > > > > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > > > > > - struts
> > > > > > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > > > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > > > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > > > > > patch myself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> > > > > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> > > > > documented somewhere?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
What I'm looking for is the ability to have a WAR that can act like a
JAR. That is, any projects that depend on the WAR will inherit its
dependencies. The current system basically requires me to publish a
WAR w/o any dependencies and then make end-users projects include both
a JAR and a WAR.
If I was able to use a WAR as a JAR, and inherit all its dependencies,
I could test and publish the WAR for download - and somehow exclude
WEB-INF/lib from publishing/downloading. The dependencies would then
be downloaded in the normal Maven way.
As it stands, my understanding is its best to create the following:
1. JAR project that contains all the dependencies
2. WAR project that contains no dependencies, just static files
3. WAR project to test including both #1 and #2 since #2 can't really
be tested since it has no dependencies.
Is this the current recommended way to do this? While the transition
to Maven 2 might be easier to end users, using the setup above seems
like it might be a lot more complicated for folks hoping to contribute
to AppFuse.
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not
>
> On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up
> > the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib?
> >
> > I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so
> > including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve
> > the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c
> > you won't get access to them anyway)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Something like
> > >
> > > <plugin>
> > > <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
> > > <configuration>
> > > <archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
> > > </configuration>
> > > </plugin>
> > >
> > >
> > > <pluginRepositories>
> > > <pluginRepository>
> > > <id>apache.org</id>
> > > <name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
> > > <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
> > > <releases>
> > > <enabled>false</enabled>
> > > </releases>
> > > </pluginRepository>
> > > </pluginRepositories>
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > > > > my IDE.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > > > > is a good one?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > > > > - data
> > > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > > > > - service
> > > > > > > > - web
> > > > > > > > - common
> > > > > > > > - common-war
> > > > > > > > - jsf
> > > > > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > > > > - spring
> > > > > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > > > > - struts
> > > > > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > > > > patch myself.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> > > > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> > > > documented somewhere?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not
On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up
> the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib?
>
> I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so
> including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve
> the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c
> you won't get access to them anyway)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Something like
> >
> > <plugin>
> > <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
> > <configuration>
> > <archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
> > </configuration>
> > </plugin>
> >
> >
> > <pluginRepositories>
> > <pluginRepository>
> > <id>apache.org</id>
> > <name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
> > <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
> > <releases>
> > <enabled>false</enabled>
> > </releases>
> > </pluginRepository>
> > </pluginRepositories>
> >
> >
> > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > > > my IDE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > > > is a good one?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > > > - data
> > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > > > - service
> > > > > > > - web
> > > > > > > - common
> > > > > > > - common-war
> > > > > > > - jsf
> > > > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > > > - spring
> > > > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > > > - struts
> > > > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > > > patch myself.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
> > >
> > > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> > > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> > > documented somewhere?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up
the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib?
I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so
including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve
the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c
you won't get access to them anyway)?
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> Something like
>
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
> <configuration>
> <archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>
>
>
> <pluginRepositories>
> <pluginRepository>
> <id>apache.org</id>
> <name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
> <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
> <releases>
> <enabled>false</enabled>
> </releases>
> </pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
>
>
> On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > > my IDE.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > > >
> > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > > is a good one?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > > - data
> > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > > - service
> > > > > > - web
> > > > > > - common
> > > > > > - common-war
> > > > > > - jsf
> > > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > > - spring
> > > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > > - struts
> > > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > > >
> > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > > >
> > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > > patch myself.
> > >
> > >
> > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
> >
> > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> > documented somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
Something like
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
<configuration>
<archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<pluginRepositories>
<pluginRepository>
<id>apache.org</id>
<name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
<url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
<releases>
<enabled>false</enabled>
</releases>
</pluginRepository>
</pluginRepositories>
On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > my IDE.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > >
> > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > is a good one?
> > > > >
> > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > - data
> > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > - service
> > > > > - web
> > > > > - common
> > > > > - common-war
> > > > > - jsf
> > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > - spring
> > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > - struts
> > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > >
> > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > >
> > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > patch myself.
> >
> >
> > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
>
> Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> documented somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > my IDE.
> > >
> > >
> > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > >
> > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > >
> > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > war:inplace.
> > > >
> > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > is a good one?
> > > >
> > > > appfuse2
> > > > - data
> > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > - hibernate
> > > > - ibatis
> > > > - service
> > > > - web
> > > > - common
> > > > - common-war
> > > > - jsf
> > > > - jsf-war
> > > > - spring
> > > > - spring-war
> > > > - struts
> > > > - struts-war
> > > > - tapestry
> > > > - tapestry-war
> > > >
> > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > >
> > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> >
> > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > patch myself.
>
>
> The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
documented somewhere?
Thanks,
Matt
>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > >
> > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > my IDE.
> >
> >
> > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> >
> > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> >
> > >
> > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > >
> > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > war:inplace.
> > >
> > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > is a good one?
> > >
> > > appfuse2
> > > - data
> > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > - hibernate
> > > - ibatis
> > > - service
> > > - web
> > > - common
> > > - common-war
> > > - jsf
> > > - jsf-war
> > > - spring
> > > - spring-war
> > > - struts
> > > - struts-war
> > > - tapestry
> > > - tapestry-war
> > >
> > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > the war-overlay feature.
> >
> > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
>
> Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> patch myself.
The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
>
> Matt
>
> > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > >
> > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> >
> > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > my IDE.
>
>
> jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> jetty:run when overlaying wars.
>
> jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
>
> >
> > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> >
> > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > war:inplace.
> >
> > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > is a good one?
> >
> > appfuse2
> > - data
> > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > - hibernate
> > - ibatis
> > - service
> > - web
> > - common
> > - common-war
> > - jsf
> > - jsf-war
> > - spring
> > - spring-war
> > - struts
> > - struts-war
> > - tapestry
> > - tapestry-war
> >
> > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > the war-overlay feature.
>
> looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
patch myself.
Matt
> The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > >
> > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
>
> Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> my IDE.
jetty6 was renamed to jetty
It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
jetty:run when overlaying wars.
jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
>
> Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
>
> I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> war:inplace.
>
> Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> is a good one?
>
> appfuse2
> - data
> - common (model objects, interfaces)
> - hibernate
> - ibatis
> - service
> - web
> - common
> - common-war
> - jsf
> - jsf-war
> - spring
> - spring-war
> - struts
> - struts-war
> - tapestry
> - tapestry-war
>
> I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> the war-overlay feature.
looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> >
> > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > >
> > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
my IDE.
Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
war:inplace.
Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
is a good one?
appfuse2
- data
- common (model objects, interfaces)
- hibernate
- ibatis
- service
- web
- common
- common-war
- jsf
- jsf-war
- spring
- spring-war
- struts
- struts-war
- tapestry
- tapestry-war
I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
the war-overlay feature.
Thanks,
Matt
>
> On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > (jetty) mailing list?
> >
> > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > bunch of files in it by default.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> (jetty) mailing list?
>
> Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> bunch of files in it by default.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org