You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/07 15:08:52 UTC
Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Hi all,
The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
about saaj-impl.
(a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl?
(b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem?
Thanks!
Karl
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
Geronimo provides artifacts for all java specs.
You can have a look here:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
*
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Yes, of course, I asked the contributor to post on your list. ;-) But
it looks like that's not necessary now.
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com> wrote:
> Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :)
> Maybe legal@ also?
>
> Florent
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
>> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
>> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
>> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
>> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
>> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
>> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
>> about saaj-impl.
>>
>> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl?
>> (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com>.
Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :)
Maybe legal@ also?
Florent
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> about saaj-impl.
>
> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl?
> (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com>.
Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :)
Maybe legal@ also?
Florent
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> about saaj-impl.
>
> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl?
> (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com>.
Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :)
Maybe legal@ also?
Florent
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> about saaj-impl.
>
> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl?
> (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:23:21 AM Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> > Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> > activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> > from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> > was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> > for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> > available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> > about saaj-impl.
>
> The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
> license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
FYI: the home page:
http://java.net/projects/saaj
explicitely shows CDDL license.
Dan
>
>
>
> Dan
>
> > (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
> > saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a
> > license problem?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Karl
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote:
>> OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a
>> fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these
>> packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle
>> recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting
>> the geronimo jars is no longer necessary?
>
> I wouldn't say recently, but yes. They did change licenses a while ago *for
> new releases* from BCL to CDDL which moved them from Category X to Category B.
> So yes, substituting the geronimo jars in MOST cases is no longer necessary.
Agreed.
> However, not all of the Sun jars have had a new release with the new License.
> That said, may folks would prefer the Apache licensed versions.
>
> That said, you specifically asked about saaj-impl, not saaj-api. Geronimo
> doesn't have a saaj-impl. The closest at Apache would likely be in Axis. I
> believe they have an saaj-impl based on Axiom someplace. Geronimo does have
> an saaj-api I believe.
>
>
>> If so, what caveats do I
>> need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy
>> whatever Chemistry does?
>
> Well, you'd need to mention the CDDL license for the saaj-impl in the
> LICENSE.TXT.
Adding a bit more background:
saaj-impl (and many of the other implementations/specs) are dual licensed GPL v2 and CDDL. Any ASF project should choose CDDL. I had thought that the procedure for this was to include both of the licenses, then explicitly choose the preferred license. Looks like I'm wrong/out-of-date. Only the CDDL license should be included. See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive for details.
--kevan
>> Karl
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
>>>> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
>>>> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
>>>> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
>>>> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
>>>> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
>>>> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
>>>> about saaj-impl.
>>>
>>> The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category
>>> b
>>> license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
>>>
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2
>>> /
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
>>>> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a
>>>> license problem?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a
> fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these
> packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle
> recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting
> the geronimo jars is no longer necessary?
I wouldn't say recently, but yes. They did change licenses a while ago *for
new releases* from BCL to CDDL which moved them from Category X to Category B.
So yes, substituting the geronimo jars in MOST cases is no longer necessary.
However, not all of the Sun jars have had a new release with the new License.
That said, may folks would prefer the Apache licensed versions.
That said, you specifically asked about saaj-impl, not saaj-api. Geronimo
doesn't have a saaj-impl. The closest at Apache would likely be in Axis. I
believe they have an saaj-impl based on Axiom someplace. Geronimo does have
an saaj-api I believe.
> If so, what caveats do I
> need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy
> whatever Chemistry does?
Well, you'd need to mention the CDDL license for the saaj-impl in the
LICENSE.TXT.
Dan
>
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> >> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> >> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> >> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> >> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> >> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> >> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> >> about saaj-impl.
> >
> > The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category
> > b
> > license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
> >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2
> > /
> >
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
> >> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a
> >> license problem?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Karl
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks - that's sufficient as far as I am concerned. ;-)
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs,
> which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the
> original ones, but I would trust Dan.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
> *
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs,
> which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the
> original ones, but I would trust Dan....
FWIW, Dan's saying that CDDL is ok comes from
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, and the conditions for
using it are spelled out there.
-Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs,
which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the
original ones, but I would trust Dan.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
*
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a
fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these
packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle
recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting
the geronimo jars is no longer necessary? If so, what caveats do I
need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy
whatever Chemistry does?
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
>> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
>> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
>> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
>> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
>> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
>> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
>> about saaj-impl.
>
> The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
> license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
>> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:23:21 AM Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> > Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> > activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> > from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> > was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> > for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> > available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> > about saaj-impl.
>
> The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
> license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
FYI: the home page:
http://java.net/projects/saaj
explicitely shows CDDL license.
Dan
>
>
>
> Dan
>
> > (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
> > saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a
> > license problem?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Karl
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a
fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these
packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle
recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting
the geronimo jars is no longer necessary? If so, what caveats do I
need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy
whatever Chemistry does?
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
>> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
>> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
>> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
>> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
>> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
>> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
>> about saaj-impl.
>
> The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
> license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
>> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> about saaj-impl.
The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
Dan
>
> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license
> problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF
> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar
> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know
> about saaj-impl.
The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b
license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/
Dan
>
> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for
> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license
> problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org