You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "James Taylor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/10 07:43:45 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2067) Sort order incorrect for variable length DESC columns

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14738208#comment-14738208 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2067:
---------------------------------------

Patch looks good, [~rajeshbabu]. Thanks for back porting. One thing that needs to be manually tested is converting old tables to the correct row key using "psql.py -u localhost". You can wait to do this until after back porting PHOENIX-2171 so you only have to do it once. You'd want to create various tables with DESC row keys in pre 4.4.1 and then run the script to ensure that the conversion works correctly and you get the expected query plan post conversion. 

> Sort order incorrect for variable length DESC columns
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2067
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>         Environment: HBase 0.98.6-cdh5.3.0
> jdk1.7.0_67 x64
> CentOS release 6.4 (2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64)
>            Reporter: Mykola Komarnytskyy
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>             Fix For: 4.5.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2067-tests.patch, PHOENIX-2067-tests2.patch, PHOENIX-2067_4.4.1.patch, PHOENIX-2067_addendum.patch, PHOENIX-2067_array_addendum.patch, PHOENIX-2067_array_addendum_v2.patch, PHOENIX-2067_v1.patch, PHOENIX-2067_v2.patch, PHOENIX-2067_v3.patch
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Create a table: 
> CREATE TABLE mytable (id BIGINT not null PRIMARY KEY, timestamp BIGINT, log_message varchar) IMMUTABLE_ROWS=true, SALT_BUCKETS=16;
> 2. Create two indexes:
> CREATE INDEX mytable_index_search ON mytable(timestamp,id) INCLUDE (log_message) SALT_BUCKETS=16;
> CREATE INDEX mytable_index_search_desc ON mytable(timestamp DESC,id DESC) INCLUDE (log_message) SALT_BUCKETS=16;
> 3. Upsert values:
> UPSERT INTO mytable VALUES(1, 1434983826018, 'message1');
> UPSERT INTO mytable VALUES(2, 1434983826100, 'message2');
> UPSERT INTO mytable VALUES(3, 1434983826101, 'message3');
> UPSERT INTO mytable VALUES(4, 1434983826202, 'message4');
> 4. Sort DESC by timestamp:
> select timestamp,id,log_message from mytable ORDER BY timestamp DESC;
> Failure: data is sorted incorrectly. In case when we have two longs which  are different only by last two digits (e.g. 1434983826155, 1434983826100)  and one of the long ends with '00' we receive incorrect order. 
> Sorting result:
> 1434983826202
> 1434983826100
> 1434983826101
> 1434983826018



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)