You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com> on 2019/08/06 07:48:44 UTC
Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix HBASE-22539.
I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager for
2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they should
take care of the new releases.
Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can find
other volunteers to make the new releases.
Thanks.
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Lets get HBASE-22843 in before RC'ing.
S
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:12 PM Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah. It is time to release new RCs.
>
> 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午3:12写道：
>
> > Seems the work is done? Let's roll the new RCs?
> >
> > Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月8日周四 上午8:19写道：
> >
> > > Yes. Affected all branch-2.0+.
> > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:40写道：
> > >
> > > > OK, will these issues also effect branch-2.1? If so I could also
> wait a
> > > > bit.
> > > >
> > > > Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道：
> > > >
> > > > > For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803.
> > These
> > > > > issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for
> user. I
> > > > > thought they can be fixed this week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many
> > > > > branches
> > > > > > (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release
> > > from
> > > > > > 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0,
> as
> > > is,
> > > > > > 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475)
> > > > including
> > > > > > the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed
> post
> > > > > > branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to
> > cover
> > > > > > releases that are missing server-side additions whether
> branch-2.0,
> > > > > > branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side
> > equivalents,
> > > > > they
> > > > > > may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have
> > also
> > > > been
> > > > > > moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > S
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release
> > > manager...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > > palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug
> fix
> > > > > > > > HBASE-22539.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release
> > > > manager
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by
> default
> > > they
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release,
> then
> > we
> > > > can
> > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com>.
Yeah. It is time to release new RCs.
张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午3:12写道：
> Seems the work is done? Let's roll the new RCs?
>
> Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月8日周四 上午8:19写道：
>
> > Yes. Affected all branch-2.0+.
> > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:40写道：
> >
> > > OK, will these issues also effect branch-2.1? If so I could also wait a
> > > bit.
> > >
> > > Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道：
> > >
> > > > For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803.
> These
> > > > issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for user. I
> > > > thought they can be fixed this week.
> > > >
> > > > Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
> > > >
> > > > > I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many
> > > > branches
> > > > > (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release
> > from
> > > > > 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as
> > is,
> > > > > 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475)
> > > including
> > > > > the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
> > > > > branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to
> cover
> > > > > releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
> > > > > branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side
> equivalents,
> > > > they
> > > > > may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have
> also
> > > been
> > > > > moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > S
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release
> > manager...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't
> that
> > > the
> > > > > > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > > > > > > HBASE-22539.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release
> > > manager
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default
> > they
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then
> we
> > > can
> > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Seems the work is done? Let's roll the new RCs?
Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月8日周四 上午8:19写道：
> Yes. Affected all branch-2.0+.
> 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:40写道：
>
> > OK, will these issues also effect branch-2.1? If so I could also wait a
> > bit.
> >
> > Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道：
> >
> > > For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803. These
> > > issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for user. I
> > > thought they can be fixed this week.
> > >
> > > Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
> > >
> > > > I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
> > > >
> > > > Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many
> > > branches
> > > > (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release
> from
> > > > 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
> > > >
> > > > Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as
> is,
> > > > 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475)
> > including
> > > > the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
> > > > branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to cover
> > > > releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
> > > > branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side equivalents,
> > > they
> > > > may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have also
> > been
> > > > moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release
> manager...
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that
> > the
> > > > > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > > > > > HBASE-22539.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release
> > manager
> > > > for
> > > > > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default
> they
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we
> > can
> > > > > find
> > > > > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com>.
Yes. Affected all branch-2.0+.
张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:40写道：
> OK, will these issues also effect branch-2.1? If so I could also wait a
> bit.
>
> Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道：
>
> > For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803. These
> > issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for user. I
> > thought they can be fixed this week.
> >
> > Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
> >
> > > I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
> > >
> > > Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many
> > branches
> > > (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release from
> > > 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
> > >
> > > Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as is,
> > > 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475)
> including
> > > the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
> > > branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to cover
> > > releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
> > > branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side equivalents,
> > they
> > > may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have also
> been
> > > moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > S
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release manager...
> > > >
> > > > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> > > >
> > > > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that
> the
> > > > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> palomino219@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > > > > HBASE-22539.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release
> manager
> > > for
> > > > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they
> > > > should
> > > > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we
> can
> > > > find
> > > > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
OK, will these issues also effect branch-2.1? If so I could also wait a bit.
Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道：
> For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803. These
> issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for user. I
> thought they can be fixed this week.
>
> Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
>
> > I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
> >
> > Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many
> branches
> > (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release from
> > 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
> >
> > Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as is,
> > 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475) including
> > the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
> > branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to cover
> > releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
> > branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side equivalents,
> they
> > may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have also been
> > moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > S
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> > >
> > > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release manager...
> > >
> > > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> > >
> > > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that the
> > > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > > > HBASE-22539.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager
> > for
> > > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they
> > > should
> > > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can
> > > find
> > > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Guanghao Zhang <zg...@gmail.com>.
For 2.2.1, I plan to include HBASE-22807&HBASE-22808&HBASE-22803. These
issues are easy to fix and the HBCK report is very useful for user. I
thought they can be fixed this week.
Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年8月7日周三 上午4:23写道：
> I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
>
> Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many branches
> (smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release from
> 2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
>
> Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as is,
> 2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475) including
> the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
> branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to cover
> releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
> branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side equivalents, they
> may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have also been
> moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
>
> Thanks,
> S
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
> >
> > Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release manager...
> >
> > Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> >
> > > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that the
> > > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > > HBASE-22539.
> > > >
> > > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager
> for
> > > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they
> > should
> > > > take care of the new releases.
> > > >
> > > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can
> > find
> > > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I'll start branch-2.0 (I can do branch-2.1 too Duo...).
Let's make 2.0.6 the last release on branch-2.0. We have too many branches
(smile).I was going to make sure I could upgrade to a 2.2 release from
2.0.... as part of checking of 2.0.6RC.
Regards adding more server-side support for HBCK2 in branch-2.0, as is,
2.0.6 will have a bunch of new HBCK2 changes (See HBASE-21475) including
the new hbck report page added by Guanghao. If more is needed post
branch-2.0 EOL, HBCK2 client-side fixup is being added still to cover
releases that are missing server-side additions whether branch-2.0,
branch-2.1 or branch-2.2. Though inferior to server-side equivalents, they
may be enough for the branch-2.0 operator. Hopefully users have also been
moving off branch-2.0 to the later releases.
Thanks,
S
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
>
> Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release manager...
>
> Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
>
> > this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that the
> > plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> > HBASE-22539.
> > >
> > > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager for
> > > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they
> should
> > > take care of the new releases.
> > >
> > > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can
> find
> > > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Not sure as we still have some pending HBCK fixes...
Maybe we will also have a 2.0.7? Depending on the release manager...
Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> 于2019年8月6日周二 下午9:12写道：
> this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that the
> plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix
> HBASE-22539.
> >
> > I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager for
> > 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they should
> > take care of the new releases.
> >
> > Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can find
> > other volunteers to make the new releases.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
Re: Need to roll 2.2.1, 2.1.6 and 2.0.2 ASAP
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
this this still going to be the final 2.0.x release? Wasn't that the
plan, a single post-2.2.0 release?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Due to the jackson CVE, and also, there is a critical bug fix HBASE-22539.
>
> I can take care of 2.1.6, and Guanghao Zhang is the release manager for
> 2.2.x, Stack is the release manager for 2.0.x, so by default they should
> take care of the new releases.
>
> Shout if you do not have enough time to make a release, then we can find
> other volunteers to make the new releases.
>
> Thanks.