You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by Alied Pérez Martínez <al...@gmail.com> on 2018/04/03 18:06:07 UTC
RE: should we label our NetCAT-reported
issues with netcat90 or something like that?
All bugs are created equal to Jira, eh? I like that.
Sent from my "burning platform" Nokia N8-00
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiří Kovalský
Sent: 03/04/2018, 07:16
To: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: should we label our NetCAT-reported issues with netcat90 or something like that?
I don't think anything like that is needed or in other words all bug
reporters are equal.
My two cents,
-Jirka
Dne 3.4.2018 v 04:45 Alied Pérez Martínez napsal(a):
> Well, that which I wrote in the subject. In past events we (actually the
> bug submission form did it) used to add a prefix like "[cat82]". I think
> we could take advantage of Jira's labels for that. Also we can label the
> issues reported while running Synergy tests and even (when integrated)
> the exception reporter can have it's label as well. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists