You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> on 2019/08/21 03:02:28 UTC
[VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Hi all,
This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
Please feel free to share your thoughts.
Thanks,
Wangda
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
,
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Haibo Chen <ha...@linkedin.com>.
+1
Haibo
________________________________
From: Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 08:28
To: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>; Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Chachen%40linkedin.com%7Cd38c56074f614dc4ced608d7264c49ee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019981409842905&sdata=iEpnkNwZ36d9c6wTRLWu4z%2FqUgL5HHHzjOtsKG4EXdk%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Haibo Chen <ha...@linkedin.com>.
+1
Haibo
________________________________
From: Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 08:28
To: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>; Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Chachen%40linkedin.com%7Cd38c56074f614dc4ced608d7264c49ee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019981409842905&sdata=iEpnkNwZ36d9c6wTRLWu4z%2FqUgL5HHHzjOtsKG4EXdk%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>.
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Cekrogen%40linkedin.com%7Cf7cda6a57de04eb1e6c008d7264b6d17%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019977701030286&sdata=I8EABq7OZfDXTQ8hSQ0MaSpBXnT4B4MXWqeFMCK7swM%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>.
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Cekrogen%40linkedin.com%7Cf7cda6a57de04eb1e6c008d7264b6d17%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019977701030286&sdata=I8EABq7OZfDXTQ8hSQ0MaSpBXnT4B4MXWqeFMCK7swM%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>.
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Cekrogen%40linkedin.com%7Cf7cda6a57de04eb1e6c008d7264b6d17%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019977701030286&sdata=I8EABq7OZfDXTQ8hSQ0MaSpBXnT4B4MXWqeFMCK7swM%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Erik Krogen <ek...@linkedin.com>.
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
________________________________
From: Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>
Cc: Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>; yarn-dev <ya...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hdfs-dev <hd...@hadoop.apache.org>; mapreduce-dev <ma...@hadoop.apache.org>; Hadoop Common <co...@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fhadoop-yarn-dev%2F201908.mbox%2F%253cCAD%2B%2BeC%3DOu-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A%40mail.gmail.com%253e&data=02%7C01%7Cekrogen%40linkedin.com%7Cf7cda6a57de04eb1e6c008d7264b6d17%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637019977701030286&sdata=I8EABq7OZfDXTQ8hSQ0MaSpBXnT4B4MXWqeFMCK7swM%3D&reserved=0
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Dinesh Chitlangia <dc...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
-Dinesh
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:22 AM Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Akira
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Thanks!
> >
> > Jonathan Hung
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> > > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> > >
> > > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wangda
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > ,
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Dinesh Chitlangia <dc...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
-Dinesh
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:22 AM Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Akira
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Thanks!
> >
> > Jonathan Hung
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> > > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> > >
> > > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wangda
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > ,
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Dinesh Chitlangia <dc...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
-Dinesh
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:22 AM Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Akira
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Thanks!
> >
> > Jonathan Hung
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> > > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> > >
> > > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wangda
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > ,
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks!
Jonathan Hung
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Subru Krishnan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Subru Krishnan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Subru Krishnan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Subru Krishnan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:28 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
>
> But I would like to say
> (1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
> should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
> found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
> susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
> backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
> 2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
>
> +1, with care. The AWS SDK needs an update on the 3.1 and 3.2 lines too
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:28 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
>
> But I would like to say
> (1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
> should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
> found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
> susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
> backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
> 2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
>
> +1, with care. The AWS SDK needs an update on the 3.1 and 3.2 lines too
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:28 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
>
> But I would like to say
> (1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
> should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
> found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
> susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
> backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
> 2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
>
> +1, with care. The AWS SDK needs an update on the 3.1 and 3.2 lines too
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:28 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
>
> But I would like to say
> (1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
> should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
> found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
> susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
> backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
> 2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
>
> +1, with care. The AWS SDK needs an update on the 3.1 and 3.2 lines too
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
But I would like to say
(1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
(2) I wrote a summary for the last Hadoop Contributor Meetup, and
circulated it internally. It wasn't meant for public consumption, but if it
helps, I can publish it here in the mailing list.
We will also have an upcoming blog post on the meetup at Cloudera's
website, too.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:16 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> > actively
> > using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
> >
> > - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> >
> > We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and
> community
> > syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> > that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> > compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it
> seemed
> > that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> > edit logs.
> >
>
>
> Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
> to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
> that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
> discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
> not at in person events.
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
But I would like to say
(1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
(2) I wrote a summary for the last Hadoop Contributor Meetup, and
circulated it internally. It wasn't meant for public consumption, but if it
helps, I can publish it here in the mailing list.
We will also have an upcoming blog post on the meetup at Cloudera's
website, too.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:16 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> > actively
> > using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
> >
> > - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> >
> > We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and
> community
> > syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> > that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> > compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it
> seemed
> > that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> > edit logs.
> >
>
>
> Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
> to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
> that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
> discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
> not at in person events.
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
But I would like to say
(1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
(2) I wrote a summary for the last Hadoop Contributor Meetup, and
circulated it internally. It wasn't meant for public consumption, but if it
helps, I can publish it here in the mailing list.
We will also have an upcoming blog post on the meetup at Cloudera's
website, too.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:16 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> > actively
> > using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
> >
> > - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> >
> > We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and
> community
> > syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> > that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> > compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it
> seemed
> > that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> > edit logs.
> >
>
>
> Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
> to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
> that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
> discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
> not at in person events.
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
But I would like to say
(1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
susceptible to known vulnerabilities. We did a lot in 3.x, some are even
backward-incompatible. But I guess we didn't imagine people are still on
2.x a few years after 3.x went GA.
(2) I wrote a summary for the last Hadoop Contributor Meetup, and
circulated it internally. It wasn't meant for public consumption, but if it
helps, I can publish it here in the mailing list.
We will also have an upcoming blog post on the meetup at Cloudera's
website, too.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:16 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> > actively
> > using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
> >
> > - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> >
> > We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and
> community
> > syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> > that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> > compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it
> seemed
> > that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> > edit logs.
> >
>
>
> Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
> to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
> that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
> discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
> not at in person events.
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
> We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
> syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
> that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> edit logs.
>
Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
not at in person events.
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
> We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
> syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
> that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> edit logs.
>
Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
not at in person events.
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
> We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
> syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
> that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> edit logs.
>
Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
not at in person events.
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
> We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
> syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
> that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
> compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
> that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
> edit logs.
>
Just a quick friendly reminder to everyone that stuff has to make it
to the mailing lists for Hadoop for it to be considered a discussion
that happened "in the community". Especially decisions and the
discussions that lead to them have to happen on our mailing lists and
not at in person events.
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>.
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
edit logs.
Verizon Media is currently working on upgrading to branch-2 from
branch-2.8. I believe LinkedIn is also interested in branch-2 and working
towards a 2.10 release.
Eric
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:03 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
> >
> > [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> > [3.0.x]
> >
> > 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
> >
>
> one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
> "last ever branch- release".
>
> Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
>
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> >>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>.
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
edit logs.
Verizon Media is currently working on upgrading to branch-2 from
branch-2.8. I believe LinkedIn is also interested in branch-2 and working
towards a 2.10 release.
Eric
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:03 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
> >
> > [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> > [3.0.x]
> >
> > 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
> >
>
> one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
> "last ever branch- release".
>
> Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
>
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> >>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>.
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
edit logs.
Verizon Media is currently working on upgrading to branch-2 from
branch-2.8. I believe LinkedIn is also interested in branch-2 and working
towards a 2.10 release.
Eric
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:03 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
> >
> > [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> > [3.0.x]
> >
> > 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
> >
>
> one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
> "last ever branch- release".
>
> Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
>
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> >>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com>.
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs and agreed that 2.10 should serve as a "bridge" release for 3.x so
that 2.x clients can talk to 3.x servers and vice versa without
compatibility issues. At the last meeting where we discussed this it seemed
that there were 3 major compatibility issues. The biggest one was in the
edit logs.
Verizon Media is currently working on upgrading to branch-2 from
branch-2.8. I believe LinkedIn is also interested in branch-2 and working
towards a 2.10 release.
Eric
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:03 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
> >
> > [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> > [3.0.x]
> >
> > 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
> >
>
> one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
> "last ever branch- release".
>
> Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
>
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7
> (inclusive),
> >>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
>
> [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> [3.0.x]
>
> 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
>
one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
"last ever branch- release".
Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> Thoughts?
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>>
>>
>> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
>
> [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> [3.0.x]
>
> 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
>
one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
"last ever branch- release".
Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> Thoughts?
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>>
>>
>> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
>
> [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> [3.0.x]
>
> 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
>
one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
"last ever branch- release".
Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> Thoughts?
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>>
>>
>> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
>
> [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> [3.0.x]
>
> 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
>
one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a
"last ever branch- release".
Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
> Thoughts?
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>>
>>
>> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Steve,
The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
[2.0.x - 2.7.x]
[3.0.x]
2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>
>
> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Steve,
The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
[2.0.x - 2.7.x]
[3.0.x]
2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>
>
> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Steve,
The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
[2.0.x - 2.7.x]
[3.0.x]
2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>
>
> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Steve,
The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
[2.0.x - 2.7.x]
[3.0.x]
2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>>
>
> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Eric Badger <eb...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks!
Jonathan Hung
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
I just put it to CWIKI:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
Any thoughts? If no I will go ahead to send it to user/dev/general email
lists. (Should we send it to general?)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
>
> I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
> thread.
>
> We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
> WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Konstantin
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>> >
>> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>> >
>> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wangda
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
>> > ,
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
I just put it to CWIKI:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
Any thoughts? If no I will go ahead to send it to user/dev/general email
lists. (Should we send it to general?)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
>
> I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
> thread.
>
> We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
> WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Konstantin
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>> >
>> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>> >
>> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wangda
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
>> > ,
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
I just put it to CWIKI:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
Any thoughts? If no I will go ahead to send it to user/dev/general email
lists. (Should we send it to general?)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
>
> I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
> thread.
>
> We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
> WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Konstantin
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>> >
>> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>> >
>> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wangda
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
>> > ,
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
I just put it to CWIKI:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
Any thoughts? If no I will go ahead to send it to user/dev/general email
lists. (Should we send it to general?)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
>
> I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
> thread.
>
> We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
> WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Konstantin
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
>> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>> >
>> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>> >
>> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wangda
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
>> > ,
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi folks,
Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
thread.
We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi folks,
Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
thread.
We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi folks,
Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
thread.
We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com>.
Hi folks,
Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
thread.
We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:45 AM Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
> >
> > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wangda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > ,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the proposal.
I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Masatake Iwasaki <iw...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>.
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks!
Jonathan Hung
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Masatake Iwasaki <iw...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>.
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the proposal.
I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the proposal.
I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the proposal.
I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Jonathan Hung <jy...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks!
Jonathan Hung
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Masatake Iwasaki <iw...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>.
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sunil Govindan <su...@apache.org>.
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Masatake Iwasaki <iw...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>.
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
--
busbey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
Posted by Kihwal Lee <ki...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>.
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Wangda
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201908.mbox/%3cCAD++eC=Ou-tit1FAoB-DbeCqe6hT7eDe7T1dYRa2p1yinpEC2A@mail.gmail.com%3e
> ,
>