You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org> on 2015/07/17 21:26:47 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Hi,
the Apache UIMA DUCC v2.0.0 RC4 is ready for voting.
Same as RC3 with a few fixes:
- Fixed Agent code to kill JP on InitializationTimeout
- Fixed Web Server (WS) System.Classes page may fail to display
when user's preference is scroll mode
- Removed dead code and unused imports
Issues fixed in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0-Ducc%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1064/org/apache/uima/
The source and binary zip/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/2.0.0/RC4/
The SVN Tag Checkout:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.0.0/
See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
test release candidate.
Vote open for 72 hours.
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The license for the bin packaging has entries for httpcore-4.2.1.jar and
httpclient-4.2.1.jar, but the lib has 4.3.5 and 4.3.2 versions.
-M
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The INSTALL file has character strings ending in TM which I think are intended
to be the trade-mark symbol, but they come out in the file unzipped from the
bin.tar.gz as:
Written and maintained by the Apache
UIMATM Development Community
I looked at this with a hex editor and the UIMATM are just 6 utf-8 chars for
this, I think.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
my error - the build I did from sources with -Dapache-release was of course
wrong. I'm re-doing it using -P instead of -D :-(.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4 - order of issues fixed?
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
No. This should be sorted. Reason to vote if down?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> The issues fixed report seems to be in an arbitrary order.
>
> Is this expected?
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4 - order of issues fixed?
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The issues fixed report seems to be in an arbitrary order.
Is this expected?
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Jira 4521 describes a regression ... the CLI parser rejects any option
value spelled the same as an option. It's a 1-line fix.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> Duccbook - chapter 20 seems partially not done - after a first bit, it is
> just
> showing headers with apparently missing content. Did something go wrong?
>
> -M
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Duccbook - chapter 20 seems partially not done - after a first bit, it is just
showing headers with apparently missing content. Did something go wrong?
-M
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4 - dropped /added jars
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Yup, this is correct. Both http-client and http-core are apache licensed.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> Compare of lib/ in 1.1.0 and 2.0.0 shows:
>
> Derby dropped, uima-ducc-db, uima-ducc-jd dropped
> new Jars: httpclient-4.3.5 and httpcore-4.3.2, and uima-ducc-container
>
> Is this correct?
>
> -Marshall
> On 7/17/2015 3:26 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Apache UIMA DUCC v2.0.0 RC4 is ready for voting.
> >
> > Same as RC3 with a few fixes:
> > - Fixed Agent code to kill JP on InitializationTimeout
> > - Fixed Web Server (WS) System.Classes page may fail to display
> > when user's preference is scroll mode
> > - Removed dead code and unused imports
> >
> > Issues fixed in this release:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0-Ducc%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
> >
> > The Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1064/org/apache/uima/
> >
> > The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/2.0.0/RC4/
> >
> > The SVN Tag Checkout:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.0.0/
> >
> > See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
> > test release candidate.
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4 - dropped /added jars
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Compare of lib/ in 1.1.0 and 2.0.0 shows:
Derby dropped, uima-ducc-db, uima-ducc-jd dropped
new Jars: httpclient-4.3.5 and httpcore-4.3.2, and uima-ducc-container
Is this correct?
-Marshall
On 7/17/2015 3:26 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Apache UIMA DUCC v2.0.0 RC4 is ready for voting.
>
> Same as RC3 with a few fixes:
> - Fixed Agent code to kill JP on InitializationTimeout
> - Fixed Web Server (WS) System.Classes page may fail to display
> when user's preference is scroll mode
> - Removed dead code and unused imports
>
> Issues fixed in this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0-Ducc%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1064/org/apache/uima/
>
> The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/2.0.0/RC4/
>
> The SVN Tag Checkout:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.0.0/
>
> See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
> test release candidate.
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The README and perhaps other files mention "Sun Java 7". This should be change
to Oracle Java 7. probably good to grep things for the word Sun...
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
oops, just 4519 is missing I think
On 7/20/2015 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
4519 was my mistake ... shouldn't have checked in the code ... and then
probably made things worse by changing the fixVersion. I could change the
Jira back as I gather it is OK to have code checked-in that's associated
with a non 2.0 Jira
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant to say that no new JIRAs should be added against a release
> candidate being voted on.
>
> The 4019 was meant for 2.0.0 I think. The JIRA reporter should decide to
> defer this or vote RC4 down
> to include the fix in RC5.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> > I think new Jiras are fine to be added, but they shouldn't be marked as
> > "fixed
> > in" 2.0.0 - it should be for a later release?
> >
> > If 4019 isn't in this release, please update the Jira to remove the fixed
> > in
> > 2.0.0...
> >
> > If that isn't the issue, more investigation needed :-).
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> > On 7/20/2015 4:23 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> > > I just checked my build directory and issuesFixed shows 4516 at the top
> > of
> > > the report. Unfortunately, the 4519 was added post RC4. We should not
> be
> > > adding new JIRAs while an RC is being voted on.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
> > >>
> > >> -Marshall
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
I meant to say that no new JIRAs should be added against a release
candidate being voted on.
The 4019 was meant for 2.0.0 I think. The JIRA reporter should decide to
defer this or vote RC4 down
to include the fix in RC5.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> I think new Jiras are fine to be added, but they shouldn't be marked as
> "fixed
> in" 2.0.0 - it should be for a later release?
>
> If 4019 isn't in this release, please update the Jira to remove the fixed
> in
> 2.0.0...
>
> If that isn't the issue, more investigation needed :-).
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 7/20/2015 4:23 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> > I just checked my build directory and issuesFixed shows 4516 at the top
> of
> > the report. Unfortunately, the 4519 was added post RC4. We should not be
> > adding new JIRAs while an RC is being voted on.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I think new Jiras are fine to be added, but they shouldn't be marked as "fixed
in" 2.0.0 - it should be for a later release?
If 4019 isn't in this release, please update the Jira to remove the fixed in
2.0.0...
If that isn't the issue, more investigation needed :-).
-Marshall
On 7/20/2015 4:23 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> I just checked my build directory and issuesFixed shows 4516 at the top of
> the report. Unfortunately, the 4519 was added post RC4. We should not be
> adding new JIRAs while an RC is being voted on.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
I just checked my build directory and issuesFixed shows 4516 at the top of
the report. Unfortunately, the 4519 was added post RC4. We should not be
adding new JIRAs while an RC is being voted on.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519?
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Built from source - OK
Installed from binary tarball and ran 1.job - OK
JIRA Report - OK
Spot checked for version 2.0.0 (README, RELEASE_NOTES.html, DuccDocs) - OK
Checked signatures on both source and binary - OK
Spot checked License and Notice - OK
[X ] +1 OK to release
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Apache UIMA DUCC v2.0.0 RC4 is ready for voting.
>
> Same as RC3 with a few fixes:
> - Fixed Agent code to kill JP on InitializationTimeout
> - Fixed Web Server (WS) System.Classes page may fail to display
> when user's preference is scroll mode
> - Removed dead code and unused imports
>
> Issues fixed in this release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0-Ducc%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1064/org/apache/uima/
>
> The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/2.0.0/RC4/
>
> The SVN Tag Checkout:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.0.0/
>
> See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
> test release candidate.
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
ok, this missing file was my fault - for specifying -Dapache-release instead of
-Papache-release.
So pleas ignore mail about it being missing.
-Marshall
On 7/20/2015 4:48 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I tried build-from-sources, and found (even specifying -Dapache-release) that
> the built tar.gz file is missing some files. One (it may be the only one) is
> the INSTALL at the top level.
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I tried build-from-sources, and found (even specifying -Dapache-release) that
the built tar.gz file is missing some files. One (it may be the only one) is
the INSTALL at the top level.
-Marshall