Re: [PR] [incubator-kie-issues#968] Support ConditionalExpr in Drools executable model [incubator-kie-drools]

["gitgabrio (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

gitgabrio commented on PR #5746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/pull/5746#issuecomment-1972709835

   > I don't think it can be ignored for the rule evaluation. If it is a boolean condition, it is a constraint in my opinion. What do you think please? Also how does it behave please for non-Boolean typed expressions?
   
   TBH I do not think so: from logical point of view, it is an "assignment" what we are talking about. "By chance, in this case the variable is a boolean, that of course can be populated only by a condition. BUt dealing with that case in a different way then the other kind of "assignment" would introduce a pretty evident unconsistency


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@kie.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@kie.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@kie.apache.org