You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Eus <so...@member.fsf.org> on 2007/02/22 14:39:50 UTC
Maven1's repo is more up-to-date than Maven2's repo? (missing jars
in Maven2's repo)
Hi Ho!
Why the public repository for Maven2 (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/) does
not contain all jars exists in the public repository for Maven1
(http://repo1.maven.org/maven/)?
For example, in the Maven1's repo you can get maven-xdoclet-plugin-1.2.3.jar
in http://repo1.maven.org/maven/xdoclet/plugins/, but you cannot get it in
the Maven2's repo in
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xdoclet/maven-xdoclet-plugin/ because the
latest version there is 1.2.
My hypothesis is that many developers still actively using Maven1 so that
they deploy the most current version of their work to the Maven1's repo.
Is that true? If it is true, then there are people (or, better, machines)
whose duty is to copy and modify jars in the Maven1's repo to the Maven2's
repo, right?
Thank you very much for your explanation.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven1%27s-repo-is-more-up-to-date-than-Maven2%27s-repo--%28missing-jars-in-Maven2%27s-repo%29-tf3272775s177.html#a9099988
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven1's repo is more up-to-date than Maven2's repo? (missing
jars in Maven2's repo)
Posted by Kathryn Huxtable <kh...@ku.edu>.
Isn't XDoclet an orphaned project? Are people still developing it? -K
On 2/22/07 8:48 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <ja...@maven.org> wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 07, at 8:39 AM 22 Feb 07, Eus wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Ho!
>>
>> Why the public repository for Maven2 (http://repo1.maven.org/
>> maven2/) does
>> not contain all jars exists in the public repository for Maven1
>> (http://repo1.maven.org/maven/)?
>> For example, in the Maven1's repo you can get maven-xdoclet-
>> plugin-1.2.3.jar
>> in http://repo1.maven.org/maven/xdoclet/plugins/, but you cannot
>> get it in
>> the Maven2's repo in
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xdoclet/maven-xdoclet-plugin/ because
>> the
>> latest version there is 1.2.
>> My hypothesis is that many developers still actively using Maven1
>> so that
>> they deploy the most current version of their work to the Maven1's
>> repo.
>> Is that true? If it is true, then there are people (or, better,
>> machines)
>> whose duty is to copy and modify jars in the Maven1's repo to the
>> Maven2's
>> repo, right?
>>
>> Thank you very much for your explanation.
>
> It means our conversion process is not working well enough for
> projects that don't have POMs. The XDoclet plugin you speak of
> doesn't look like it has a valid POM which makes it hard to convert.
> And right now if a POM is not available in conjunction with xdoclet
> stuff in m1, which is a mess BTW, results in it not getting
> converted. Maven 2.x is strict about having a POM. No POM, no place
> in the repository, that's how it works. So you have a couple options.
>
> Complain to the Xdoclet people to fix their projects and provide the
> correct metadata, or provide us with POMs to fix the problem. We
> cannot be watchdogs for everything though we will in the future have
> better reporting for things that are wrong with artifacts submitted.
>
> Jason.
>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven1%27s-repo-
>> is-more-up-to-date-than-Maven2%27s-repo--%28missing-jars-in-Maven2%
>> 27s-repo%29-tf3272775s177.html#a9099988
>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven1's repo is more up-to-date than Maven2's repo? (missing jars in Maven2's repo)
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
On 22 Feb 07, at 8:39 AM 22 Feb 07, Eus wrote:
>
> Hi Ho!
>
> Why the public repository for Maven2 (http://repo1.maven.org/
> maven2/) does
> not contain all jars exists in the public repository for Maven1
> (http://repo1.maven.org/maven/)?
> For example, in the Maven1's repo you can get maven-xdoclet-
> plugin-1.2.3.jar
> in http://repo1.maven.org/maven/xdoclet/plugins/, but you cannot
> get it in
> the Maven2's repo in
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xdoclet/maven-xdoclet-plugin/ because
> the
> latest version there is 1.2.
> My hypothesis is that many developers still actively using Maven1
> so that
> they deploy the most current version of their work to the Maven1's
> repo.
> Is that true? If it is true, then there are people (or, better,
> machines)
> whose duty is to copy and modify jars in the Maven1's repo to the
> Maven2's
> repo, right?
>
> Thank you very much for your explanation.
It means our conversion process is not working well enough for
projects that don't have POMs. The XDoclet plugin you speak of
doesn't look like it has a valid POM which makes it hard to convert.
And right now if a POM is not available in conjunction with xdoclet
stuff in m1, which is a mess BTW, results in it not getting
converted. Maven 2.x is strict about having a POM. No POM, no place
in the repository, that's how it works. So you have a couple options.
Complain to the Xdoclet people to fix their projects and provide the
correct metadata, or provide us with POMs to fix the problem. We
cannot be watchdogs for everything though we will in the future have
better reporting for things that are wrong with artifacts submitted.
Jason.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven1%27s-repo-
> is-more-up-to-date-than-Maven2%27s-repo--%28missing-jars-in-Maven2%
> 27s-repo%29-tf3272775s177.html#a9099988
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven1's repo is more up-to-date than Maven2's repo? (missing jars in Maven2's repo)
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
On 22 Feb 07, at 12:08 PM 22 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> you are talking about a maven 1 plugin. M1 plugins don't work with m2,
> that's why is not in the maven2 repository
>
They need to be as we're eventually going to serve everything from
the m2 repository. So they need to be there. A mod_proxied request
will go to the m2 repository and it may very well need m1 plugins.
Jason.
> On 2/22/07, Eus <so...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ho!
>>
>> Why the public repository for Maven2 (http://repo1.maven.org/
>> maven2/) does
>> not contain all jars exists in the public repository for Maven1
>> (http://repo1.maven.org/maven/)?
>> For example, in the Maven1's repo you can get maven-xdoclet-
>> plugin-1.2.3.jar
>> in http://repo1.maven.org/maven/xdoclet/plugins/, but you cannot
>> get it in
>> the Maven2's repo in
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xdoclet/maven-xdoclet-plugin/
>> because the
>> latest version there is 1.2.
>> My hypothesis is that many developers still actively using Maven1
>> so that
>> they deploy the most current version of their work to the Maven1's
>> repo.
>> Is that true? If it is true, then there are people (or, better,
>> machines)
>> whose duty is to copy and modify jars in the Maven1's repo to the
>> Maven2's
>> repo, right?
>>
>> Thank you very much for your explanation.
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven1%27s-
>> repo-is-more-up-to-date-than-Maven2%27s-repo--%28missing-jars-in-
>> Maven2%27s-repo%29-tf3272775s177.html#a9099988
>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven1's repo is more up-to-date than Maven2's repo? (missing jars in Maven2's repo)
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
you are talking about a maven 1 plugin. M1 plugins don't work with m2,
that's why is not in the maven2 repository
On 2/22/07, Eus <so...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ho!
>
> Why the public repository for Maven2 (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/) does
> not contain all jars exists in the public repository for Maven1
> (http://repo1.maven.org/maven/)?
> For example, in the Maven1's repo you can get maven-xdoclet-plugin-1.2.3.jar
> in http://repo1.maven.org/maven/xdoclet/plugins/, but you cannot get it in
> the Maven2's repo in
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xdoclet/maven-xdoclet-plugin/ because the
> latest version there is 1.2.
> My hypothesis is that many developers still actively using Maven1 so that
> they deploy the most current version of their work to the Maven1's repo.
> Is that true? If it is true, then there are people (or, better, machines)
> whose duty is to copy and modify jars in the Maven1's repo to the Maven2's
> repo, right?
>
> Thank you very much for your explanation.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven1%27s-repo-is-more-up-to-date-than-Maven2%27s-repo--%28missing-jars-in-Maven2%27s-repo%29-tf3272775s177.html#a9099988
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org