You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Tibor Digana (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2014/12/02 09:40:12 UTC
[jira] (SUREFIRE-995) Support searching superclass for JUnit
@Category
[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=358428#comment-358428 ]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-995:
---------------------------------------
@Paul
This feature should already work with surefire-2.18.
Can you check it out? Let me know if the issue can be closed.
Thx
> Support searching superclass for JUnit @Category
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-995
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-995
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Junit 4.x support
> Affects Versions: 2.14.1
> Reporter: Paul Philion
> Assignee: Tibor Digana
>
> It looks like when evaluating <groups> and <excludedGroups> using the @Category, only the test class itself (and not any superclasses) is searched for the annotation.
> It would be very helpful if the search included superclasses.
> Aside: It took me a few hours to track this down. I like to implement abstract superclasses for all my testing patterns (integration test with full DB vs. "functional test" using stub DB vs strict unit test with mock objects). Typically, adding the annotation to the superclass (like @BeforeClass and @AfterClass) to handle standard initialization. However, the @Category works only in the concrete test class (not an abstract superclass).
> If you need a more concrete example (sample code, etc.), I am happy to provide.
> Right now, the simple work-around is to include @Category in all concrete test classes where it is important. I'm using it in/exclude integration tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)