You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/12 16:46:54 UTC
VOTE: Extend CXF to support JAX-RPC
I already committed a contribution that adds a first round of JAX-RPC
support (e.g., SOAP encoding) to CXF, based on an informal email
exchange. I didn't think that it might be vote-worthy. More recent email
suggests that it is a decision that deserves a formal vote.
So, please vote on the proposition: that CXF should extend to include
support for JAX-RPC.
Re: VOTE: Extend CXF to support JAX-RPC
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
To be completely correct, go ahead and withdraw it. Not a big deal.
Just one more email. :-)
Dan
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Do I need to withdraw the vote, or do we just let it languish while we
> continue to Quake(r).
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:32 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > I already committed a contribution that adds a first round of
> > > JAX-RPC support (e.g., SOAP encoding) to CXF, based on an informal
> > > email exchange. I didn't think that it might be vote-worthy. More
> > > recent email suggests that it is a decision that deserves a formal
> > > vote.
> > >
> > > So, please vote on the proposition: that CXF should extend to
> > > include support for JAX-RPC.
> >
> > I don't know that this really deserves a vote yet. We should focus
> > on reaching consensus in the other thread. We should talk through
> > the pros/cons and establish what they really are.
> >
> > - Dan
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: VOTE: Extend CXF to support JAX-RPC
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Do I need to withdraw the vote, or do we just let it languish while we
continue to Quake(r).
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:32 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote:
> > I already committed a contribution that adds a first round of JAX-RPC
> > support (e.g., SOAP encoding) to CXF, based on an informal email
> > exchange. I didn't think that it might be vote-worthy. More recent email
> > suggests that it is a decision that deserves a formal vote.
> >
> > So, please vote on the proposition: that CXF should extend to include
> > support for JAX-RPC.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I don't know that this really deserves a vote yet. We should focus on
> reaching consensus in the other thread. We should talk through the
> pros/cons and establish what they really are.
>
> - Dan
>
Re: VOTE: Extend CXF to support JAX-RPC
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com>.
Benson Margulies wrote:
> I already committed a contribution that adds a first round of JAX-RPC
> support (e.g., SOAP encoding) to CXF, based on an informal email
> exchange. I didn't think that it might be vote-worthy. More recent email
> suggests that it is a decision that deserves a formal vote.
>
> So, please vote on the proposition: that CXF should extend to include
> support for JAX-RPC.
>
>
>
>
>
I don't know that this really deserves a vote yet. We should focus on
reaching consensus in the other thread. We should talk through the
pros/cons and establish what they really are.
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog