You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2012/01/02 17:03:01 UTC

Txn heads-up (3)

Hi,

so it's really going better now !

Tests run: 665, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 129

Failed tests:
   
testPwdLockout(org.apache.directory.server.core.authn.ppolicy.PasswordPolicyTest)
   
testPwdMinAge(org.apache.directory.server.core.authn.ppolicy.PasswordPolicyTest): 
expected:<SUCCESS> but was:<OTHER>
   
testPwdHistory(org.apache.directory.server.core.authn.ppolicy.PasswordPolicyTest): 
expected:<2> but was:<1>
   
testPwdMaxAgeAndGraceAuth(org.apache.directory.server.core.authn.ppolicy.PasswordPolicyTest): 
expected:<SUCCESS> but was:<INVALID_CREDENTIALS>


Compared to what we had before I started to mess with the existing code, 
this is a clear improvement :

Tests run: 668, Failures: 4, Errors: 11, Skipped: 128

Failed tests:   
testLookupControl(org.apache.directory.server.core.exception.ExceptionServiceIT)
   
testRenameShouldChangeModifyTimestamp(org.apache.directory.server.core.operational.OperationalAttributeServiceIT)
   
testAddEnabledSchemaWithExistingDisabledDeps(org.apache.directory.server.core.schema.MetaSchemaHandlerIT)
   
testAddEnabledSchemaWithNotExistingDeps(org.apache.directory.server.core.schema.MetaSchemaHandlerIT)

Tests in error:
   org.apache.directory.server.core.exception.ExceptionServiceIT: 
ERR_250_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS ou=users,ou=system already exists!
   
testModifyControl(org.apache.directory.server.core.exception.ExceptionServiceIT)
   
testRevertModifyOperations(org.apache.directory.server.core.changelog.DefaultChangeLogIT): 
ERR_54 Cannot add a value which is already present : old value  
org.apache.directory.server.core.changelog.DefaultChangeLogIT: ERR_54 
Cannot add a value which is already present : old value
   org.apache.directory.server.core.jndi.referral.DeleteReferralIT: 
ERR_250_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS ou=Roles,o=MNN,c=WW,ou=system already exists!
   org.apache.directory.server.core.jndi.referral.ModifyReferralIT: 
ERR_55 Trying to remove an non-existant attribute: ATTRIBUTE_TYPE ( 2.5.4.13
   
org.apache.directory.server.core.jndi.referral.RenameReferralIgnoreIT: 
Attempt to lookup non-existant entry: ou=Groups,o=MNN,c=WW,ou=system
   
testRenameRdnExistIsReferralJNDIIgnore(org.apache.directory.server.core.jndi.referral.RenameReferralIgnoreIT): 
Attempt to lookup non-existant entry: ou=Roles,o=MNN,c=WW,ou=system
   
testRenameRdnExistIsReferralCoreAPIWithManageDsaIt(org.apache.directory.server.core.jndi.referral.RenameReferralIgnoreIT): 
Attempt to lookup non-existant entry: ou=Roles,o=MNN,c=WW,ou=system
   
testAddStructuralOCinheritingFromStructuralOC(org.apache.directory.server.core.schema.MetaObjectClassHandlerIT): 
ERR_250_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS 
m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.3.100001,ou=objectCla
sses,cn=apacheMeta,ou=schema already exists!
   
testDeleteEnabledValidSchema(org.apache.directory.server.core.schema.MetaSchemaHandlerIT): 
ERR_250_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS cn=dummy,ou=schema already exists!


I'll now work on the passwordPolicy failures, I'm pretty sure we get 
them because of teh way the chain is now handled.

Btw, the operations are going *way* faster with the txn layer compared 
ot what we get on trunks. This was expected, but it's good to see...

Let's cross fingers !

More to come later

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


Re: Txn heads-up (3)

Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Snip

> I'll now work on the passwordPolicy failures, I'm pretty sure we get them
because of teh way the chain is now handled.
>
> Btw, the operations are going *way* faster with the txn layer compared ot
what we get on trunks. This was expected, but it's good to see...
>

That's awesome news. Great job!! Thx for the update.

Alex

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex