You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> on 2017/09/11 07:39:12 UTC
[DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
Thoughts ?
[1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> It becomes a read/write github repository, so all features of github are
> available instead of just the hosting.
> Mainly, this allows using PR and merging them as you would do for any
> github repo.
Well, infra can SELECTIVELY enable various GitHub features. For CXF, we told them NOT to enable the GitHub issues or Wiki, but those are options if you feel they are useful. CXF has always used JIRA and Confluence and moving off them now would be difficult and, until we got a better feel for the gitbox integration, adding additional bug trackers (aka: enabling issues) just seemed like more work for the project. It is something that can be enabled later if wanted. Basically, baby steps, one step at a time.
Basically, the main benefits are:
1) Direct push to GitHub
2) Ability to manage pull requests directly in the GUI. That includes using the merge button and close buttons and such. No funky “this closes ####” commits needed.
Dan
> 2017-09-12 18:04 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>:
>
>> fine with me, what are the benefits of it again?
>> couldn't find what it is really good for compared to what we already got
>> ...
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>> 2017-09-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has
>>> been proposed by infra).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/11/2017 09:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
>>>> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
>>>> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Member
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
>> Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>
>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
It becomes a read/write github repository, so all features of github are
available instead of just the hosting.
Mainly, this allows using PR and merging them as you would do for any
github repo.
2017-09-12 18:04 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>:
> fine with me, what are the benefits of it again?
> couldn't find what it is really good for compared to what we already got
> ...
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2017-09-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has
> > been proposed by infra).
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 09/11/2017 09:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >
> >> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
> >> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
> >> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
> >>
> >> Thoughts ?
> >>
> >> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
Very good question actually as this is not detailed in the proposal.
CXF already switched to gitbox and what it allows me to do is work with
github like I do with any of my own repositories.
So I can push directly to the github repo and also use the github UI to
close or merge PRs or for example directly edit a readme in the github UI.
Christian
On 12.09.2017 18:04, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> fine with me, what are the benefits of it again?
> couldn't find what it is really good for compared to what we already got
> ...
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2017-09-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has
>> been proposed by infra).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/2017 09:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
>>> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
>>> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
fine with me, what are the benefits of it again?
couldn't find what it is really good for compared to what we already got
...
regards, Achim
2017-09-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> +1
>
> I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has
> been proposed by infra).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/11/2017 09:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
>> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
>> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has been
proposed by infra).
Regards
JB
On 09/11/2017 09:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
> use of whichever github features they want (like PRs).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com