You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ju...@apache.org on 2011/07/15 17:42:31 UTC
svn commit: r1147197 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Author: julianfoad
Date: Fri Jul 15 15:42:30 2011
New Revision: 1147197
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1147197&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Cast votes.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1147197&r1=1147196&r2=1147197&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Fri Jul 15 15:42:30 2011
@@ -44,6 +44,14 @@ Candidate changes:
Consistent behaviour of the 1.7 client with 1.6/1.7 servers. (issue #3949)
Votes:
+1: danielsh
+ -0: julianfoad (Too many loose ends. Should SVN_ERR_IS_UNLOCK_ERROR()
+ get the same treatment? danielsh on IRC: "I'm not sure I was
+ happy with the error/warning issue here. but patching the server
+ makes the reporting be ehwat the test likes (and what 1.7 does)."
+ Does the error/warning thing matter? philipm on IRC: "Does it fix
+ multiple targets?" Have we analyzed whether the test properly
+ reflects real life needs? Could the bug in unlock prevent people from
+ removing a lock on a nonexistent path?)
* r1144316
Issue 3953: reject invalid svn:mergeinfo at commit time over DAV.
@@ -51,6 +59,7 @@ Candidate changes:
Issue 3895, already merged, was supposed to cover DAV but did not.
Votes:
+1: philip, pburba
+ +0: julianfoad (reviewed, not tested)
* r894014, 894029, 896247, 905705
Use serf_connection_create2 instead of serf_connection_create so that