You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by André Jager <an...@spe-unna.de> on 2007/07/31 18:29:11 UTC
Slow network throughput NMS -> 2mb / Sec
Hello,
I use ActiveMQ (4.1.1) in conjunction with C# and am experiencing very bad
network performance.
I wrote a test program to test the performance. The client sends 4kb Byte
Messages, the server reads the queue, acknowledges the messages and discards
the content. Client and server are written in C# using the latest NMS /
ActiveMQ client.
Since I was suspecting DOTNET Sockets to be a bottleneck, I wrote a small
Client / Server program sending 4 kb blocks using DOTNET sockets. The Client
and Server are written in C#.
In both cases I send the same data, a 700 mb stream. With ActiveMQ I can put
through 2 mb / Sec, with the bare metal socket implementation in DOTNET I
get a 27 mb / Sec throughput (1gb network).
At the server, when I run the ActiveMQ test client, I see the JAVA VM jump
to 80% CPU (for what it is, I have no experience with JAVA).
Is there a general performance problem or is there a performance problem in
conjunction with NMS.
Who wrote NMS, maybe we can contribute to the project solving these
performance issues (if they are present in NMS).
thanks,
André Jager
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slow-network-throughput-NMS--%3E-2mb---Sec-tf4194154s2354.html#a11927662
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Slow network throughput NMS -> 2mb / Sec
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
We are always grateful of contributions - it would be great if you
could help out - the community of users and developers is what apache
projects are about afterall.
cheers,
Rob
'Go Get Integrated - ride the Camel! - http://activemq.apache.org/
camel/'
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On Jul 31, 2007, at 5:29 PM, André Jager wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I use ActiveMQ (4.1.1) in conjunction with C# and am experiencing
> very bad
> network performance.
>
> I wrote a test program to test the performance. The client sends
> 4kb Byte
> Messages, the server reads the queue, acknowledges the messages and
> discards
> the content. Client and server are written in C# using the latest
> NMS /
> ActiveMQ client.
>
> Since I was suspecting DOTNET Sockets to be a bottleneck, I wrote a
> small
> Client / Server program sending 4 kb blocks using DOTNET sockets.
> The Client
> and Server are written in C#.
>
> In both cases I send the same data, a 700 mb stream. With ActiveMQ
> I can put
> through 2 mb / Sec, with the bare metal socket implementation in
> DOTNET I
> get a 27 mb / Sec throughput (1gb network).
>
> At the server, when I run the ActiveMQ test client, I see the JAVA
> VM jump
> to 80% CPU (for what it is, I have no experience with JAVA).
>
> Is there a general performance problem or is there a performance
> problem in
> conjunction with NMS.
>
> Who wrote NMS, maybe we can contribute to the project solving these
> performance issues (if they are present in NMS).
>
> thanks,
> André Jager
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slow-network-
> throughput-NMS--%3E-2mb---Sec-tf4194154s2354.html#a11927662
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>